Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 07-17-2007, 07:16 PM
Evan Evan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: startupping
Posts: 14,351
Default Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Leaked

[ QUOTE ]
Why don't people who do this have a scanner that outputs text.

[/ QUOTE ]
Because it's a lot faster to take pictures most likely, unless you have some really fancy (expensive) scanner that is specifically made for books.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-17-2007, 07:36 PM
Blarg Blarg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Who is Fistface?
Posts: 27,473
Default Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Leaked

Yeah a lot of OCR is pretty much teh suck.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-17-2007, 07:40 PM
TheMetetron TheMetetron is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Blog Updated Dec 1st
Posts: 6,839
Default Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Leaked

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why don't people who do this have a scanner that outputs text.

[/ QUOTE ]
Because it's a lot faster to take pictures most likely, unless you have some really fancy (expensive) scanner that is specifically made for books.

[/ QUOTE ]

I guess, my scanner will scan a page and output text in PDF form. I thought this was pretty standard.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-17-2007, 07:40 PM
mrkilla mrkilla is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tombstone
Posts: 4,307
Default Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Leaked

[ QUOTE ]
Yeah a lot of OCR is pretty much teh suck.

[/ QUOTE ]

you don't need to scan this OCR to do a better job then this though, just regular scan as an image would suffice

I Downloaded it as well, it seems legit enough since I mean what did they find like 10 copies of the last one in a field somwhere? anyway the reason that it may not be is where is a picture of the cover
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-17-2007, 07:52 PM
AntonHeat AntonHeat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 3,532
Default Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Leaked

The site is down, someone pm me thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-17-2007, 08:05 PM
Evan Evan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: startupping
Posts: 14,351
Default Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Leaked

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why don't people who do this have a scanner that outputs text.

[/ QUOTE ]
Because it's a lot faster to take pictures most likely, unless you have some really fancy (expensive) scanner that is specifically made for books.

[/ QUOTE ]

I guess, my scanner will scan a page and output text in PDF form. I thought this was pretty standard.

[/ QUOTE ]
Wtf dude. Have you ever seen a book? Can you ballpark the ways in which it might be harder to scan an entire book into text than it would be to scan an individual sheet of paper?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-17-2007, 08:23 PM
XXXNoahXXX XXXNoahXXX is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 8,159
Default Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Leaked

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why don't people who do this have a scanner that outputs text.

[/ QUOTE ]
Because it's a lot faster to take pictures most likely, unless you have some really fancy (expensive) scanner that is specifically made for books.

[/ QUOTE ]

I guess, my scanner will scan a page and output text in PDF form. I thought this was pretty standard.

[/ QUOTE ]
Wtf dude. Have you ever seen a book? Can you ballpark the ways in which it might be harder to scan an entire book into text than it would be to scan an individual sheet of paper?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, but even if you didn't want to ruin the binding, there are plenty of scanners that are quicker to use than digital cameras. I've had to scan in books before and it would probably take <45 minutes for this book.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-17-2007, 08:27 PM
Evan Evan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: startupping
Posts: 14,351
Default Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Leaked

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why don't people who do this have a scanner that outputs text.

[/ QUOTE ]
Because it's a lot faster to take pictures most likely, unless you have some really fancy (expensive) scanner that is specifically made for books.

[/ QUOTE ]

I guess, my scanner will scan a page and output text in PDF form. I thought this was pretty standard.

[/ QUOTE ]
Wtf dude. Have you ever seen a book? Can you ballpark the ways in which it might be harder to scan an entire book into text than it would be to scan an individual sheet of paper?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, but even if you didn't want to ruin the binding, there are plenty of scanners that are quicker to use than digital cameras. I've had to scan in books before and it would probably take <45 minutes for this book.

[/ QUOTE ]
I think it's fair to say that the average scanner would take longer than 45 minutes to scan a 600 page book, while the time it would take with a camera will be pretty much the same across models.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-17-2007, 08:30 PM
samjjones samjjones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 9,415
Default Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Leaked

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why don't people who do this have a scanner that outputs text.

[/ QUOTE ]
Because it's a lot faster to take pictures most likely, unless you have some really fancy (expensive) scanner that is specifically made for books.

[/ QUOTE ]

I guess, my scanner will scan a page and output text in PDF form. I thought this was pretty standard.

[/ QUOTE ]
Wtf dude. Have you ever seen a book? Can you ballpark the ways in which it might be harder to scan an entire book into text than it would be to scan an individual sheet of paper?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, but even if you didn't want to ruin the binding, there are plenty of scanners that are quicker to use than digital cameras. I've had to scan in books before and it would probably take <45 minutes for this book.

[/ QUOTE ]
I think it's fair to say that the average scanner would take longer than 45 minutes to scan a 600 page book, while the time it would take with a camera will be pretty much the same across models.

[/ QUOTE ]

Evan - why can't he just use the scanner that Bud Fox used in Wall Street?
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-17-2007, 08:36 PM
Evan Evan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: startupping
Posts: 14,351
Default Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Leaked

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why don't people who do this have a scanner that outputs text.

[/ QUOTE ]
Because it's a lot faster to take pictures most likely, unless you have some really fancy (expensive) scanner that is specifically made for books.

[/ QUOTE ]

I guess, my scanner will scan a page and output text in PDF form. I thought this was pretty standard.

[/ QUOTE ]
Wtf dude. Have you ever seen a book? Can you ballpark the ways in which it might be harder to scan an entire book into text than it would be to scan an individual sheet of paper?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, but even if you didn't want to ruin the binding, there are plenty of scanners that are quicker to use than digital cameras. I've had to scan in books before and it would probably take <45 minutes for this book.

[/ QUOTE ]
I think it's fair to say that the average scanner would take longer than 45 minutes to scan a 600 page book, while the time it would take with a camera will be pretty much the same across models.

[/ QUOTE ]

Evan - why can't he just use the scanner that Bud Fox used in Wall Street?

[/ QUOTE ]
Hahaha, good idea.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.