|
|
#31
06-29-2007, 01:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $600 NL: Deep Stacks, AKs versus H@llinggol
[ QUOTE ]
Yea I've played with HALL at 5k and his strategy is basically go all in with a flush draw no matter if it's calling off your stack or shoving with no FE so I assume this is why he is bustooooooooo. [/ QUOTE ] This might be a leak for him, but it gets him so much action on his made hands. Honestly though, I don't know if he is good or just plays a lag style that is hard to deal with. Also his VPIP went down to about 33 after people starting 3 betting him at the table and when one big fish left the table. So maybe he is decent at adapting. 
|
|
#32
06-29-2007, 01:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $600 NL: Deep Stacks, AKs versus H@llinggol
[ QUOTE ]
he played like 12 tables for 24 hours straight for like a year are you saying he wasnt a winner over huge sample size or are you saying you cant tell if he was a winner because he doesnt HAVE a huge sample size ? [/ QUOTE ] IIRC I saw a pt screenshot of >150k hands. He was a loser by like 3bb/100. I'm *pretty* sure this is accurate. 10 BIs at a table does not make someone a winner. Hall fanboy [censored] still can't see this.
|
|
#33
06-29-2007, 01:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $600 NL: Deep Stacks, AKs versus H@llinggol
And putting ridic portions of your stack in pf with [censored] like 45o etc. cannot be +EV no matter how good you are.
|
|
#34
06-29-2007, 02:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $600 NL: Deep Stacks, AKs versus H@llinggol
he was playing more like 20/14, your sample must have been severely distorted. anyway, i don't mind your line but i'd rather just bet the flop.
|
|
#35
06-29-2007, 02:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $600 NL: Deep Stacks, AKs versus H@llinggol
[ QUOTE ]
And putting ridic portions of your stack in pf with [censored] like 45o etc. cannot be +EV no matter how good you are. [/ QUOTE ] BUT HAY, it works for twin_caracas AMIRITE?
|
|
#36
06-29-2007, 02:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $600 NL: Deep Stacks, AKs versus H@llinggol
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] And putting ridic portions of your stack in pf with [censored] like 45o etc. cannot be +EV no matter how good you are. [/ QUOTE ] BUT HAY, it works for twin_caracas AMIRITE? [/ QUOTE ] I 4GOT DAT!!1
|
|
#37
06-29-2007, 03:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $600 NL: Deep Stacks, AKs versus H@llinggol
[ QUOTE ]
he was playing more like 20/14, your sample must have been severely distorted. anyway, i don't mind your line but i'd rather just bet the flop. [/ QUOTE ] I said my sample when posting was 91 hands. How are you claiming to know what he was playing like since you weren't at the table? Or you mean you have him at 20/14?
|
|
#38
06-29-2007, 07:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $600 NL: Deep Stacks, AKs versus H@llinggol
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I'm trying to make it look like I've got QQ+ playing for pot control. [/ QUOTE ] Why would you be playing for pot control with QQ+ here? [/ QUOTE ] Because we have over 200 BB? [/ QUOTE ] Maybee you should be playing for pot control with QQ, but with KK or AA you should certainly be looking to felt it against H@LL.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
