#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reraising pocket AA, KK, QQ, theory question????
Read:
The Theory of Poker /end thread |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reraising pocket AA, KK, QQ, theory question????
[ QUOTE ]
Read: The Theory of Poker /end thread [/ QUOTE ] I have the book. What specifically are you referring to in the book. Page numbers would be really good. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reraising pocket AA, KK, QQ, theory question????
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Read: The Theory of Poker /end thread [/ QUOTE ] I have the book. What specifically are you referring to in the book. Page numbers would be really good. [/ QUOTE ] Anything concerning odds. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reraising pocket AA, KK, QQ, theory question????
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I really don't understand why we do this. At 50 and 100nl where i play most of the time, reraising will often fold the original raiser leaving you with a small return for your big hand. Flat calling disguises your hand completely and you can often win a huge pot by doing this. I am aware of other factors involved but would rather hear from you all first, in this discussion, so i will better understand the principles involved in playing these hands this way. [/ QUOTE ] fold preflop [/ QUOTE ] sarcasm never does much for me when i'm trying to understand something better. take it elsewhere. [/ QUOTE ] Little sense of humor never hurt anyone [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Seriously though, not reraising these hands is going to cost you a boatload of money in the longrun. Like others have said before, if you're not getting action, your 3-betting range is likely a bit too small. I love to reraise with hands like 65s, 22-44 occasionaly, T9o. It's important to keep in mind what you want to happen postflop when you reraise. Out of curiosity, what is you sample size of "not getting action?" |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reraising pocket AA, KK, QQ, theory question????
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I really don't understand why we do this. At 50 and 100nl where i play most of the time, reraising will often fold the original raiser leaving you with a small return for your big hand. Flat calling disguises your hand completely and you can often win a huge pot by doing this. I am aware of other factors involved but would rather hear from you all first, in this discussion, so i will better understand the principles involved in playing these hands this way. [/ QUOTE ] fold preflop [/ QUOTE ] sarcasm never does much for me when i'm trying to understand something better. take it elsewhere. [/ QUOTE ] Little sense of humor never hurt anyone [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Seriously though, not reraising these hands is going to cost you a boatload of money in the longrun. Like others have said before, if you're not getting action, your 3-betting range is likely a bit too small. I love to reraise with hands like 65s, 22-44 occasionaly, T9o. It's important to keep in mind what you want to happen postflop when you reraise. Out of curiosity, what is you sample size of "not getting action?" [/ QUOTE ] my sample size is 3 years of play and about 300,000 hands most at 50 and 100NL. Its not scientific, its just a sense of how often the original raiser folds when reraised. More at 50NL than at 100NL. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reraising pocket AA, KK, QQ, theory question????
are you one of these types who limps w/ these hands and then whines endlessly when they get cracked by one of the 4-6 people who saw the flop?
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reraising pocket AA, KK, QQ, theory question????
[ QUOTE ]
are you one of these types who limps w/ these hands and then whines endlessly when they get cracked by one of the 4-6 people who saw the flop? [/ QUOTE ] No. You'll have to find your associates elsewhere. |
|
|