#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CHAOS AT THE 2007 WSOP: (Sign up/discussion thread.)
Ok, I just got around to reading the 9->A thing. I may have to do some prep work for this. First question though for game theorists, is there ever a reason to choose T, J, or Q? Seems like picking any of those is dominated by picking K.
Edit - and if that is the case, is this not just rock paper scissors with a few sucker bets thrown in? |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CHAOS AT THE 2007 WSOP: (Sign up/discussion thread.)
fnord - it's better if the card is used up after you play it. I was kind of hoping that's what he meant.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CHAOS AT THE 2007 WSOP: (Sign up/discussion thread.)
I'm open to suggestions on the poker game. It will have a big impact on the game, and many powers will be effected.
Right now I have it set up so that the higher the card that is chosen the more you risk losing. So if you want to got K,A you have to risk more. Also I'll probably remove the evil terrorist role. Current set up. N1 Evil wins and beats the village: A - evil team immune from night kills K - 5 evils immune from night kills Q - 4 evils immune from night kills J - 3 evils immune from night kills T - 2 evils immune from night kills 9 - 1 evil immune to night kills Good wins and beats evils: A - 6 good immune from night kills K - 5 goodimmune from night kills Q - 4 good immune from night kills J - 3 good immune from night kills T - 2 good immune from night kills 9 - 1 good immune to night kills N2 Evil wins and beats good: A - evil immune + extra kill K - evil immune + evil peek Q - evil immune J - 4 evil protected T - 3 evil protected 9 - 2 evil protected N2 good wins and beats evil: A - peek + poker player protected + king protected K - peek + poker player protected Q - peek J - poker player and king protected T - 2 protects 9 - 1 protects N3 Evil wins and beats good: A - poker player and king die K - poker player dies, evil immune, evil peek, good miss seer peek Q - poker player dies, evil immune, good miss seer peek J - poker player dies, evil immune, evil peek T - poker player dies, evil immune 9 - poker player dies N3 good wins and beats evil: A - evil dies + extra seer peek + 50% of village protected K - evil dies + peek Q - evil dies J - seer peek + 50% of village protected T - seer peek 9 - 50 % of village protected |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CHAOS AT THE 2007 WSOP: (Sign up/discussion thread.)
IN IN IN IN
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CHAOS AT THE 2007 WSOP: (Sign up/discussion thread.)
Current sign ups: 18
durron Jeremy ASpoker8 Hornacek Dustin Luckay Jack Bando Lastchance BradleyT Eskimo Zurvan nich matrix kyro fnord IY MDorand fmxda |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CHAOS AT THE 2007 WSOP: (Sign up/discussion thread.)
[ QUOTE ]
N1 Evil wins and beats the village: A - evil team immune from night kills K - 5 evils immune from night kills Q - 4 evils immune from night kills J - 3 evils immune from night kills T - 2 evils immune from night kills 9 - 1 evil immune to night kills [/ QUOTE ] Is this the World Series of Pinochle? I [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Pinochle. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CHAOS AT THE 2007 WSOP: (Sign up/discussion thread.)
So the better card you beat, the more goodies you get?
"Wins if he is killed by a pro-village action." What's a pro-village action? |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CHAOS AT THE 2007 WSOP: (Sign up/discussion thread.)
bump, a pro village action would be a lynch or a pro-village character doing something resulting in his death.
Ex. good vigilante, matasow etc... |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CHAOS AT THE 2007 WSOP: (Sign up/discussion thread.)
I'd like to get 5-7 more players if possible. I'm gone until mid-late Sunday, anyone seen bumping this thread will be awarded brownie points (may or may not affect the game).
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CHAOS AT THE 2007 WSOP: (Sign up/discussion thread.)
Bizzump and IN!
This looks like a lot of fun! |
|
|