A hand against Swami... - Page 3

nineinchal · #21 11-13-2007, 03:31 PM

I just called his river bet.

He tabled an 8 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

Drunk Swami=negative EV

3rdCheckRaise · #22 11-13-2007, 03:34 PM

Go Swami!!!!!!!!!!!

*TT* · #23 11-13-2007, 11:56 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I just called his river bet.

He tabled an 8 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

Drunk Swami=negative EV

[/ QUOTE ]

for what its worth the last time I played with Swami regularly was more than a year ago when he went on the wagon, he would never raise a flop with an A if he has nothing but a flushdraw after someone donked into the field, he was too weak-passive.

nineinchal · #24 11-14-2007, 06:31 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I just called his river bet.

He tabled an 8 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

Drunk Swami=negative EV

[/ QUOTE ]

for what its worth the last time I played with Swami regularly was more than a year ago when he went on the wagon, he would never raise a flop with an A if he has nothing but a flushdraw after someone donked into the field, he was too weak-passive.

[/ QUOTE ]

His hand ranges open up when he's loaded, as well as much more aggressive style emerging.

StrictlyStrategy · #25 11-14-2007, 11:00 AM

lol Swami isn't betting this river with AK. At least not sober. He's the type of guy that autochecks AK/AA on the river because "the hand is over."

pocketpared · #26 11-14-2007, 12:30 PM

Poker beer muscles. Interesting.

Dagger78 · #27 11-14-2007, 03:09 PM

[ QUOTE ]
including a very drunk Swami who likes to raise on the button.

[/ QUOTE ]

even bigger reason to muck preflop.

ssmallz · #28 11-14-2007, 10:35 PM

Why are you checking the river? I Bet/call 100% of the time here

nineinchal · #29 11-15-2007, 10:16 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Why are you checking the river? I Bet/call 100% of the time here

[/ QUOTE ]

Because I rethought my strategy of a check/raise. I had to consider that he was in fact drawing to the flush. If he held a set, he would have reraised me again on the turn.

sirlurkalot · #30 11-15-2007, 10:58 AM

[/ QUOTE ] "If he held a set, he would have reraised me again on the turn."

[/ QUOTE ]

If he had a set, he SHOULD have reraised, but w/4 straight cards on the board and the fd, it is unlikely. Drunk or sober, he won't 3bet unless he's 90% sure he's winning the pot.