|
|
#21
11-13-2007, 11:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: thin
[ QUOTE ]
I'm value betting down to 95-52 exactly here. [/ QUOTE ] I dunno about the weaker fives. I think my cutoff would be something like T5. At least we agree that 22 and 33 would be silly. A5=all aboard the valuetown express 
|
|
#22
11-14-2007, 11:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: thin
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm value betting down to 95-52 exactly here. [/ QUOTE ] I dunno about the weaker fives. I think my cutoff would be something like T5. At least we agree that 22 and 33 would be silly. A5=all aboard the valuetown express [/ QUOTE ] T5 is stronger than A5 here.
|
|
#23
11-14-2007, 11:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: thin
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I'm value betting down to 95-52 exactly here. [/ QUOTE ] I dunno about the weaker fives. I think my cutoff would be something like T5. At least we agree that 22 and 33 would be silly. A5=all aboard the valuetown express [/ QUOTE ] T5 is stronger than A5 here. [/ QUOTE ] sorry I meant 95
|
|
#24
11-15-2007, 01:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: thin
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I'm value betting down to 95-52 exactly here. [/ QUOTE ] I dunno about the weaker fives. I think my cutoff would be something like T5. At least we agree that 22 and 33 would be silly. A5=all aboard the valuetown express [/ QUOTE ] T5 is stronger than A5 here. [/ QUOTE ] sorry I meant 95 [/ QUOTE ] 95 is just as strong as 25 here.
|
|
#25
11-15-2007, 01:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: thin
I bet the river and feel pretty confident about getting called and winning.
|
|
#26
11-15-2007, 01:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: thin
[ QUOTE ]
i guess the point here is that i need a very specific read to make this bet. wasnt this a pretty clear VB in SSHE? i dont have it with me so i forget the page...anyone have a copy on hand? [/ QUOTE ] I don't have the book with me, but I know the passage you're talking about. It is read-specific. I think it was in the section on tells, where a signal of weakness shifted a weak hand into a value bet on the river. I think the read you're looking for is someone who is raising with almost all pocket pairs between KK and 55 and who would have signaled he held a king by raising either preflop or on the flop.
|
|
#27
11-15-2007, 04:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: thin
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I'm value betting down to 95-52 exactly here. [/ QUOTE ] I dunno about the weaker fives. I think my cutoff would be something like T5. At least we agree that 22 and 33 would be silly. A5=all aboard the valuetown express [/ QUOTE ] T5 is stronger than A5 here. [/ QUOTE ] sorry I meant 95 [/ QUOTE ] 95 is just as strong as 25 here. [/ QUOTE ] coach me on how to read boards?
|
|
#28
11-15-2007, 09:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: thin
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I'm value betting down to 95-52 exactly here. [/ QUOTE ] I dunno about the weaker fives. I think my cutoff would be something like T5. At least we agree that 22 and 33 would be silly. A5=all aboard the valuetown express [/ QUOTE ] T5 is stronger than A5 here. [/ QUOTE ] sorry I meant 95 [/ QUOTE ] 95 is just as strong as 25 here. [/ QUOTE ] coach me on how to read boards? [/ QUOTE ] kicker doesn't play...
|
|
#30
11-15-2007, 01:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: thin
[ QUOTE ]
seems standard to me [/ QUOTE ] the house is divided 50/50 it appears. must not be standard I think a lot depends on what you're goals are (like James. pointed out). if you want to project a v-betting machine, loose image, then its a bet. lately i've been projecting a Bernie-esque, tight so i can steal pots on occasion type-image, so i think this should have been a check here.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
