Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > MTT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-19-2007, 10:34 PM
homanga homanga is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 552
Default JJ MP with UTG Limp

Still Early not a lot of reads

Poker Stars, $25 + $2.50 NL Hold'em Tournament, 100/200 Blinds, 9 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

CO: 5,200
BTN: 4,815
SB: 2,415
BB: 3,985
UTG: 3,723
UTG+1: 3,625
Hero (UTG+2): 8,200
MP1: 4,890
MP2: 5,424

Pre-Flop: (300) J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (UTG+2)
UTG calls 200, UTG+1 folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to 600</font>, <font color="red">MP1 raises to 4,890 and is All-In</font>, 5 folds, UTG calls 3,523 and is All-In,
Hero ???
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-19-2007, 11:36 PM
bruno_pro bruno_pro is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 18
Default Re: JJ MP with UTG Limp

i would fold that quickly, but thats just me..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-19-2007, 11:49 PM
b-komplex b-komplex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 278
Default Re: JJ MP with UTG Limp

Blah. Fold I guess. QQ is a call though.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-20-2007, 02:51 AM
pokerfreak_21 pokerfreak_21 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 13
Default Re: JJ MP with UTG Limp

I think i fold QQ here
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-20-2007, 03:30 AM
elcastigador elcastigador is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: gettin back my tacos
Posts: 479
Default Re: JJ MP with UTG Limp

Depending if they have an image of you or not governs my call here. If no reads this is def a tough spot. I probably fold here but have seen this play by UTG made w/ AK before but you're probably behind MP anyways. Blahhh, fold. Nh.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-20-2007, 09:42 AM
TheFoxNL TheFoxNL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Back For More
Posts: 593
Default Re: JJ MP with UTG Limp

QQ borderline here
fold
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-20-2007, 09:53 AM
usha usha is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kickapoo
Posts: 225
Default Re: JJ MP with UTG Limp

fold and raise more pre pls.
I think I need KK+ to call here.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-20-2007, 09:56 AM
Pokerfarian Pokerfarian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 594
Default Re: JJ MP with UTG Limp

I'd raise more than 600 with a limper in, ~1K. Then I'm happy to call 1 shove.
As played 2 players have got involved &amp; there's slightly less dead money/overlay &amp; I think you should fold JJ here. I'm think folding QQ here is an error though.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-20-2007, 10:01 AM
usha usha is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kickapoo
Posts: 225
Default Re: JJ MP with UTG Limp

Why do you fold JJ but not QQ?
Do you think UTG is calling here with AQ?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-20-2007, 10:13 AM
Pokerfarian Pokerfarian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 594
Default Re: JJ MP with UTG Limp

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 42.128% 37.41% 04.73% 3060402 386620.83 { QQ+, AKs, AKo }
Hand 1: 27.249% 22.85% 04.40% 1869643 359918.83 { TT+, AQs+, AKo }
Hand 2: 30.623% 27.56% 03.07% 2254675 251005.33 { QQ }

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 43.983% 41.23% 02.77% 5568417 374074.00 { QQ+, AKs, AKo }
Hand 1: 29.884% 25.94% 03.95% 3503798 533841.50 { TT+, AQs+, AKo }
Hand 2: 26.133% 24.83% 01.31% 3353449 177337.83 { JJ }

These seem fairly okay ranges (UTG being the tighter). Short answer as to why QQ&gt;JJ is that MP1 shoves JJ here most of the time
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.