BB/100 - Page 3

ahnuld · #21 10-15-2007, 06:04 PM

yeah my last 60k hands at 5/10 have been 5.1ptbb playing 8-11 tables. Pretty sure if I cut down to 6 tables and played 2-4 or 3-6 6-7pt/bb per hundred would be sustainable.

Ship Ship McGipp · #22 10-15-2007, 06:15 PM

i think my last 100k hands at 5-10 my wr is like .18

HustlerLA · #23 10-15-2007, 06:23 PM

I would be more interested in getting a poll of how many tables people play? I feel like I can keep track of how each player plays with 2 tables and thats it. If I am 3+ tables then I have to go with lines that should be optimal based on a player's PAHUD/pt stats. Comments?

fringsrache · #24 10-15-2007, 06:27 PM

8 tables is my maximum. but i also play on sites with [censored]/fast software.

HustlerLA · #25 10-15-2007, 06:37 PM

SO with 8 tables you make plays soley based on PTstats and regulars' images? I am not expected to notice how seat 2 on table 7 is playing right?

AceCR9 · #26 10-15-2007, 06:45 PM

[ QUOTE ]
-0.2PTBB

[/ QUOTE ]

winna

G_Dollaz · #27 10-15-2007, 06:57 PM

[ QUOTE ]
SO with 8 tables you make plays soley based on PTstats and regulars' images? I am not expected to notice how seat 2 on table 7 is playing right?

[/ QUOTE ]

You are supposed to notice this. Maybe you wouldn't have as good of a read as you would if you were only 4-8 tabling, but you're definitely still supposed to have reads....

G_Dollaz · #28 10-15-2007, 07:01 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
6

[/ QUOTE ]

6 is pretty [censored] good in this day and age. Seabeast is the only person I've seen post proof of running @ 6 while multitabling over a large sample (I consider multitabling 10+ tables). I'm sure there are a couple others but they're few and far between. 4 is very solid for 12 tabling.

[/ QUOTE ]

12 tabling seems like a bad idea. Also, I have 5.7ptbb over 100k hands w/n lsat 4 months. 6 is def doable

[/ QUOTE ]

12 tabling is where it's @!!! No, seriously though, maybe I'm more concerned w/ my hourly than my ptbb/100, idk if that's a good thing/bad thing, whatever.... I honestly thought most everyone who was playing for a living in midstakes was playing 10+ tables. I stand corrected

LucidDream · #29 10-15-2007, 07:02 PM

im pretty sure i could maintain 6 at 2/4 4-6 tabling over a large sample...don't want to stay at 2/4 long enough to find out though.

GoldenIP · #30 10-16-2007, 11:08 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I consider multitabling 10+ tables

[/ QUOTE ]

haha

what are your thoughts on polygamy?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeti - you always crack me up. I need to ninja-edit my OOT thread response to 3 2+2ers I'd like to meet IRL.