|
|
|
|
#1
11-07-2007, 10:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Don Shula 72\' miami coach- \"undefeated pats deserve an asterisk\"
I'd like to see the Pats go undefeated untill they get to the AFC playoff game, and then the Colts beat them in Foxboro on their way to back-to-back SuperBowls.
But I know that's just me. If the Colts/Pats do meet again, will it be SuperBowl 41 3/4? 
|
|
#2
11-07-2007, 02:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Don Shula 72\' miami coach- \"undefeated pats deserve an asterisk\"
[ QUOTE ]
If the Colts/Pats do meet again, will it be SuperBowl 41 3/4? [/ QUOTE ] I don't see who in NFC would be able to compete with either team. DVOA agrees.
|
|
#3
11-07-2007, 03:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Don Shula 72\' miami coach- \"undefeated pats deserve an asterisk\"
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If the Colts/Pats do meet again, will it be SuperBowl 41 3/4? [/ QUOTE ] I don't see who in NFC would be able to compete with either team. DVOA agrees. [/ QUOTE ] Dallas is within striking distance if 17% is 3pts then Dallas is 4.75pts weaker than NE, 1.75pts than Indy or so, on a neutral field that is one big play from being overcome
|
|
#4
11-07-2007, 03:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Don Shula 72\' miami coach- \"undefeated pats deserve an asterisk\"
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] If the Colts/Pats do meet again, will it be SuperBowl 41 3/4? [/ QUOTE ] I don't see who in NFC would be able to compete with either team. DVOA agrees. [/ QUOTE ] Dallas is within striking distance if 17% is 3pts then Dallas is 4.75pts weaker than NE, 1.75pts than Indy or so, on a neutral field that is one big play from being overcome [/ QUOTE ] there is no way Dallas would be -5 on a neutral field vs NE. NE was -5.5 @ Dallas, and I think that was pretty fair. thats said, sure, the teams are competitive, but NE would/should be favored by more than a TD on a neutral field (which is about the same as a potential line for Indy @ NE I think)
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
