Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-11-2007, 10:51 AM
nutlow nutlow is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: in ur pc
Posts: 26
Default turn decision

SB: 60/15/1.2/35

Party Poker
Limit Holdem Ring game
Limit: $10/20
4 players
Converter

Pre-flop: (4 players) Hero is BB with Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
UTG folds, Button calls, SB calls, Hero checks.

Flop: 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (3SB, 3 players)
SB checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets</font>, Button folds, SB calls.

Turn: 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2.5BB, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">SB bets</font>, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises</font>

i figured a raise would charge some possible OESD and flushdraws and he wouldnt 3bet with them so i can safely fold to a reraise.

the pot is small so getting 3-6 outers to fold, in case he is bluffing, doesnt have much value. an argument for calling down.

what do you think?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-11-2007, 11:04 AM
yourface yourface is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,457
Default Re: turn decision

again, cut off the action after your last action. skews replies etc.

this villain seems quite aggressive. I would just call down and let him keep betting his cheese for me, especially since I wouldn't feel comfortable folding to a 3bet from this guy.

but maybe I'm just saying that because I know he likely had a very weak hand here based on his turn action.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-11-2007, 11:39 AM
Gurravasa Gurravasa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: what used to Denmark before we beat them
Posts: 1,307
Default Re: turn decision

Any reads on villain?

Against an unknown I would not raise turn. He could bet a draw, but could have a whole lot of other hands as well. I don't like to raise-fold weak make hands HU on turn, I rather take them to SD for the same amount.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-11-2007, 03:37 PM
pokerprose pokerprose is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 98
Default Re: turn decision

I think the raise is OK since he could be betting a draw or 87.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-11-2007, 08:29 PM
Gurravasa Gurravasa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: what used to Denmark before we beat them
Posts: 1,307
Default Re: turn decision

[ QUOTE ]
I think the raise is OK since he could be betting a draw or 87.

[/ QUOTE ] You can't raise just becuase there is a possibility he's betting a draw. You must base your decision on the probability that he has a draw rather than hand that beats you. I would want some good reads to be sure enough that villain has a draw to raise here. It's always hard to interpret donks like this and why build the pot with a weak vunarble hand that easily could be beat already or be outdrawn on the river?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-12-2007, 06:26 AM
rigoletto rigoletto is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 2,345
Default Re: turn decision

[ QUOTE ]
the pot is small so getting 3-6 outers to fold, in case he is bluffing, doesnt have much value. an argument for calling down.

[/ QUOTE ]

He will call with his 3-6 outers, so this is an additional argument for raising.

[ QUOTE ]
I don't like to raise-fold weak make hands HU on turn

[/ QUOTE ]

A 3-bet will very rarely be a bluff, since the donk is a set up when he has a 3-betting hand and it is usually a very strong one. When bluffing he will C/R. So raise folding has the same EV as calling down.

[ QUOTE ]
It's always hard to interpret donks like this and why build the pot with a weak vunarble hand that easily could be beat already or be outdrawn on the river?

[/ QUOTE ]

Fear of being outdrawn is a reason for raising, not calling.

It is probably close, but i favor raising. The only hand I'm really worried about is a weak K and the fact that he will C/F some of his weaker holdings on the river makes me favor a raise.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-12-2007, 11:02 AM
Gurravasa Gurravasa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: what used to Denmark before we beat them
Posts: 1,307
Default Re: turn decision

[ QUOTE ]
A 3-bet will very rarely be a bluff, since the donk is a set up when he has a 3-betting hand and it is usually a very strong one. When bluffing he will C/R. So raise folding has the same EV as calling down.

[/ QUOTE ]
I wonder where you get all that information about what this donk means? And could you please explain how you calculate EV fo a call and a raise here?

[ QUOTE ]
Fear of being outdrawn is a reason for raising, not calling.


[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe you didn't read what you quoted, because I said that our hand could be beat or be outdrawn not only outdrawn. If we're sure he has a draw off course we raise. In general I think your reasoning seems to be based on reads we don't have.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.