|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 - playing in rr pot with no set
[ QUOTE ]
But Queen could be a good card to bluff... Since Hero 3-bet preflop and checked the turn he is likely to have overcards and Q could help him. Moreover, Q completes some draws that Villain can be afraid of [/ QUOTE ] Usually if you're going to bluff you want to bet more than half the pot. Clearly hero shouldn't have bet the river, because villian called. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 - playing in rr pot with no set
We don't know what Villain is going to do while we decide to bet or not to bet. Maybe he calls in 10% of the time and folds in 90%
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 - playing in rr pot with no set
What do you really think you're going to get the villian to fold there?
Also, it's more likely that villian had a draw than anything. Sick call Kenny Tran says he had QJ, or dem pocket 7's. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 - playing in rr pot with no set
Just call preflop, there is no need to 3bet this hand out of the blinds. As played, what incentive have you given him to fold? You bet weak on the flop, check the turn, and bet weak on the river. Do you want him to put you on runner runner flush? I think that if you want to bluff him out you need to bet bigger on the flop and bet the turn aswell but my opinion is that you should call preflop, and as played, bet more on the flop then give up when called.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 - playing in rr pot with no set
Ty all for your answers
Ama, but why 3-betting preflop is bad here? Villain has a pretty big range of hands that he raises from the button and that will fold to 3-bet or c-bet. If we flop a set it's easier to put all our money in the rr pot. It's a kind of 3-betting light |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 - playing in rr pot with no set
[ QUOTE ]
Ty all for your answers Ama, but why 3-betting preflop is bad here? Villain has a pretty big range of hands that he raises from the button and that will fold to 3-bet or c-bet. If we flop a set it's easier to put all our money in the rr pot. It's a kind of 3-betting light [/ QUOTE ] Its turning a mid strength hand into a bluff in a rereaised pot out of position which can get really expensive. I would rather 3bet 72o here than 66 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 - playing in rr pot with no set
don't understand=((((
He's TAG, why 3-betting small pocket pairs against him OOP is bad? If the flop contains cards that are higher than 6, than 66 play exactly like 72o OOP in a rr pot( c-bet on the flop and if Villain doesn't fold, check/fold on all streets) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 - playing in rr pot with no set
[ QUOTE ]
don't understand=(((( He's TAG, why 3-betting small pocket pairs against him OOP is bad? If the flop contains cards that are higher than 6, than 66 play exactly like 72o OOP in a rr pot( c-bet on the flop and if Villain doesn't fold, check/fold on all streets) [/ QUOTE ] Somewhere deep in you, you know that you shouldn't have bet river [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 - playing in rr pot with no set
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] But Queen could be a good card to bluff... Since Hero 3-bet preflop and checked the turn he is likely to have overcards and Q could help him. Moreover, Q completes some draws that Villain can be afraid of [/ QUOTE ] Clearly hero shouldn't have bet the river, because villian called. [/ QUOTE ] this is really bad logic. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 - playing in rr pot with no set
What's his attempt to steal? Unless it's pretty high I'm not 3 betting with 66 vs. someone with an 11% PFR.
Once he calls you on the flop give up and check fold the rest of the way. |
|
|