Read this before starting a "Who Do I pick in Survivor" Thread

[kyro]

yeah, you're right, my bad.

[Thremp]

[ QUOTE ]
yeah, you're right, my bad.

[/ QUOTE ]

Its okay. The mention of "variance" just usually puts me on tilt.

I really like the way you analyze the lines though. Its similar to what I'd do. Since not all the outcomes are a perfect Bell Curve.

[kyro]

[ QUOTE ]
I'd also like to add that looking ahead to week 7 is retarded.

[/ QUOTE ]

This I disagree with. Especially in a large league.

[THAY3R]

I still don't see why Jax was a bad pick unless you want to be results oriented.

[kyro]

[ QUOTE ]
I still don't see why Jax was a bad pick unless you want to be results oriented.

[/ QUOTE ]

I didn't like it only because AFC South tends to play each other tough in divisional games.

Plus, Vince Young just wins football games. Didn't you hear?

[benza13]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I still don't see why Jax was a bad pick unless you want to be results oriented.

[/ QUOTE ]

I didn't like it only because AFC South tends to play each other tough in divisional games.

Plus, Vince Young just wins football games. Didn't you hear?

[/ QUOTE ]

It was one of the first games I ruled out this past weekend because of the divisional game factor. Plus I couldn't possibly take David Garrard to beat Vince Young, could I?

[SL__72]

I thought Jax was a solid pick. :'(

[lastchance]

I think it was.

[DonkeyKongSr]

Is there a thread for this already? If not, looking for advice on week 2.

I had Seattle in Week 1. Pittsburgh and Chicago seem like the safest picks, but I don't want to go with either quite yet if I don't have to. However, looking down Pitt's schedule, I don't see a great game to pick for quite a few weeks (2 tough home games, a bye, and several road games). Should I just go with them now?

[Joe Tall]

One day too late. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]