AS-Something Game Thread - Page 179

soah · #**1781** 06-09-2007, 05:20 AM

You can't lynch everyone. You should lynch the most likely wolves and not lynch the most likely villagers. If you're wrong, you're gonna lose. I don't see how there can possibly be any controversy over this.

ESKiMO-SiCKNE5S · #**1782** 06-09-2007, 08:56 AM

this is controversy because ppl always feel like crying when they lose a game....

Jack Bando · #**1783** 06-09-2007, 11:33 AM

[ QUOTE ]
You can't lynch everyone. You should lynch the most likely wolves and not lynch the most likely villagers. If you're wrong, you're gonna lose. I don't see how there can possibly be any controversy over this.

[/ QUOTE ]

True, but I think we should at least say, both internally and to the village, maybe the guy we think is 95% villa is a wolf.

Of course, you will then get lynched for this.

Neil S · #**1784** 06-09-2007, 03:27 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Of course, you will then get lynched for this.

[/ QUOTE ]Not necessarily. Not by the good players when they are villagers. That much I've noticed.

Jack Bando · #**1785** 06-09-2007, 03:50 PM

Yeah, but there have been games where "He just said a stupid idea." was the basis for a vote/lynch. I remember doing this to Econophile in Heroes for example.

Neil S · #**1786** 06-09-2007, 04:04 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, but there have been games where "He just said a stupid idea." was the basis for a vote/lynch. I remember doing this to Econophile in Heroes for example.

[/ QUOTE ]Basis for a vote, yes, especially in a non-majority lynch game.

But in majority lynch, people are less hasty. And in non-majority lynch, people will tend to come around.