Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-10-2007, 07:01 PM
SplawnDarts SplawnDarts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,332
Default Re: need help with strategy against bad players

[ QUOTE ]
Min-raise is fine, though, if the stacks are deep. There's something about this in NLHTAP, doubling the stakes with a nice situation, good implied odds, etc.


[/ QUOTE ]

I'd be very interested in Slansky's thinking on this. When I think "implied odds" I usually think in terms of the ratio between what a play is going to cose me, and what I might win (usually, 1 stack is substituted in as an upper bound). It would seems like min-raising would make that ratio worse and thus be contrary to implied odds. But maybe I'm misinterpreting him. Anyone know what page the quote is on in NLH-TAP?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-10-2007, 10:26 PM
Dov Dov is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Won\'t be long now...
Posts: 1,639
Default Re: need help with strategy against bad players

The reason the min-raise improves your implied odds when the stacks are deep is that it allows you to make larger bets later in the hand with less suspicion of a monster from your opponents.

Betting $150 into a $400 pot does not seem nearly as hard to call as a $150 bet into a $200 pot.

Not only that, but if you can get in a raise somewhere (as you are hoping), a reasonable amount will be magnified b/c of the pf minraise.

All of this assumes deep stacks relative to the blinds.

Dov
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-10-2007, 11:15 PM
AKQJ10 AKQJ10 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Hsv or the Tunica Horseshoe, pick one
Posts: 5,754
Default Re: need help with strategy against bad players

Actually you're right, and there was a very controversial Ed Miller post about how it might be right to limp something like J9s on the button, where limping could be preferable to raising based on implied odds.

But it depends on both stack size and the nature of your hand. J9s is harder to hit than a small pair. NLHE:TAP (Sklansky and Miller, if it was just Sklansky the book would be unintelligible) does suggest pot-sweetening raises at times, most specifically with small pairs. You're cutting down on your preflop IO somewhat, true, but increasing the probability of a huge mistake by your opponent when you connect.

It also suggests occasionally raising marginal hands like T8 or something for deception. In small-stakes games opponents are rarely paying enough attention to make the deception worthwhile, although taking initiative and winning the pot preflop or on the flop without a showdown is worth raising sometimes.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.