|
|
#21
11-12-2007, 08:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
[ QUOTE ]
Also, I just stumbled over some very solid proof of the identity of Shark_Man_Mike1. Im not going to post it because he is a 2p2er and probably doesn't want to be outed. The only thing I am going to say is that it was pretty easy to find. I just don't think it is right to out someone that made a new acct to obv hide their identity. [/ QUOTE ] ........ 
|
|
#22
11-12-2007, 08:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
Honestly takes almost no effort to figure out. Heh, Im thinking now that it was pretty pointless to post that tho
|
|
#23
11-12-2007, 08:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Also, I just stumbled over some very solid proof of the identity of Shark_Man_Mike1. Im not going to post it because he is a 2p2er and probably doesn't want to be outed. The only thing I am going to say is that it was pretty easy to find. I just don't think it is right to out someone that made a new acct to obv hide their identity. [/ QUOTE ] ........ [/ QUOTE ] I thought this was pretty well known
|
|
#24
11-12-2007, 08:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
I have only seen that name a few times before today, I had no clue who it was
|
|
#27
11-12-2007, 08:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
Full Tilt Poker Game #4155864314: Table Boss (heads up) - $300/$600 - No Limit Hold'em - 19:46:42 ET - 2007/11/12
Seat 1: Shark_Man_Mike1 ($61,799.50) Seat 2: tie53 ($166,343.50) Shark_Man_Mike1 posts the small blind of $300 tie53 posts the big blind of $600 The button is in seat #1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Shark_Man_Mike1 raises to $1,800 tie53 raises to $6,200 Shark_Man_Mike1 has 15 seconds left to act Shark_Man_Mike1 raises to $15,000 tie53 has 15 seconds left to act tie53 has requested TIME tie53 raises to $25,000 Shark_Man_Mike1 has 15 seconds left to act Shark_Man_Mike1 has requested TIME Shark_Man_Mike1 calls $10,000 *** FLOP *** [3h 5s 8s] tie53 bets $21,600 Shark_Man_Mike1 raises to $36,799.50, and is all in tie53 calls $15,199.50 Shark_Man_Mike1 shows [Ac Ah] tie53 shows [Ad Kc] *** TURN *** [3h 5s 8s] [4h] *** RIVER *** [3h 5s 8s 4h] [Tc] Shark_Man_Mike1 shows a pair of Aces tie53 shows Ace King high Shark_Man_Mike1 wins the pot ($123,598.50) with a pair of Aces *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $123,599 | Rake $0.50 Board: [3h 5s 8s 4h Tc] Seat 1: Shark_Man_Mike1 (small blind) showed [Ac Ah] and won ($123,598.50) with a pair of Aces Seat 2: tie53 (big blind) showed [Ad Kc] and lost with Ace King high
|
|
#28
11-12-2007, 08:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
[ QUOTE ]
Also, I just stumbled over some very solid proof of the identity of Shark_Man_Mike1. Im not going to post it because he is a 2p2er and probably doesn't want to be outed. The only thing I am going to say is that it was pretty easy to find. I just don't think it is right to out someone that made a new acct to obv hide their identity. [/ QUOTE ] that should be more reason to out these multi account cheaters
|
|
#29
11-12-2007, 08:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
Odd bet sizing reminds me of CTS, though I doubt it's actually him - he wouldn't have a reason to not play on the MUCKEM acct.
edit: confirmed NOT to be cts
|
|
#30
11-12-2007, 08:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
[ QUOTE ]
Honestly takes almost no effort to figure out. Heh, Im thinking now that it was pretty pointless to post that tho [/ QUOTE ] So who the hell is it retard? Dont act like you're all high and mighty because you found something out.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
