|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AQ reraised pot, line check. 600NL
utg in 4 handed is co, yes, but its still utg so u cant justify rr just b/c he opened in the co cuz hes still utg. i guess u probly wdnt even call it co cuz doesnt there have to b others b4 co for it to be the co?!? cut-off.. has to b something 2 cutoff like the cutoff from mid-pos & button, i dont know, now im confused
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AQ reraised pot, line check. 600NL
[ QUOTE ]
utg in 4 handed is co, yes, but its still utg so u cant justify rr just b/c he opened in the co cuz hes still utg...im confused [/ QUOTE ]yes, you are. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AQ reraised pot, line check. 600NL
yeah, you're right i didn't notice your second post, utg 4 handed is obv exactly the same as co 6 handed, but you didn't specify it was 4-handed in the OP, please specify next time. 3-betting is obv fine/standard vs co.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AQ reraised pot, line check. 600NL
[ QUOTE ]
utg in 4 handed is co, yes, but its still utg so u cant justify rr just b/c he opened in the co cuz hes still utg. [/ QUOTE ] so when you play three handed and button opens your reasoning is "oh UTG raised, I gotta fold"? lol and gl. On topic: If I checked the flop I wouldn't fold in general. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AQ reraised pot, line check. 600NL
3 betting there pf is almost standard for me
|
|
|