The New Official FTP Regulars Thread

[goofyballer]

[ QUOTE ]
awesome goofyballer, i'd love to see one for 3/6 and 5/10

[/ QUOTE ]

I only mine 2/4 right now since that's what I play.

This is from around September 1st.

cmitch, I can look you up when I get home.

[ QUOTE ]
Do you mind posting another one sorted by BB/100 with anyone over 10k hands?

[/ QUOTE ]

Is there an easy way to filter out people with <10k hands? Otherwise that would be reallllly difficult to do manually since it would be full of donks that ran hot for 20 hands never to be seen again.

Also, you can already see from this summary that the people with large winrates are concentrated more towards the bottom of the "hands played" list because variance hasn't really evened things out yet. For example, browerkid and tkdcrew's winrates are both really similar in the summary I posted to how they were when I only had, say, 40k hands on each of them, so up around there is a better metric by which to judge someone's winrate. I imagine there are probably a lot of people running at like 15ptbb over 12k hands or ridic stuff like that which won't really teach us much.

I could do another one with biggest $$ winners.

[mustmuck]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
awesome goofyballer, i'd love to see one for 3/6 and 5/10

[/ QUOTE ]

I only mine 2/4 right now since that's what I play.

This is from around September 1st.

cmitch, I can look you up when I get home.

[ QUOTE ]
Do you mind posting another one sorted by BB/100 with anyone over 10k hands?

[/ QUOTE ]

Is there an easy way to filter out people with <10k hands? Otherwise that would be reallllly difficult to do manually since it would be full of donks that ran hot for 20 hands never to be seen again.

Also, you can already see from this summary that the people with large winrates are concentrated more towards the bottom of the "hands played" list because variance hasn't really evened things out yet. For example, browerkid and tkdcrew's winrates are both really similar in the summary I posted to how they were when I only had, say, 40k hands on each of them, so up around there is a better metric by which to judge someone's winrate. I imagine there are probably a lot of people running at like 15ptbb over 12k hands or ridic stuff like that which won't really teach us much.

I could do another one with biggest $$ winners.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sep 1st? What % of hands would you estimate you get?

You can filter by hands played under Preferences.

[tannenj]

fwiw, he has a little less than half of my hands over the provided span. and the win rate is off by about 1.5 ptbb/100.

definitely interesting to look at, though.

[wuwei]

[ QUOTE ]


Is there an easy way to filter out people with <10k hands? Otherwise that would be reallllly difficult to do manually since it would be full of donks that ran hot for 20 hands never to be seen again.

I could do another one with biggest $$ winners.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd like to see the biggest $$ winner pic!

Regarding the first part, I would think you could do this by exporting to excel and doing it there, or maybe filters in PT (I'm at work, can't investigate this atm).

[tannenj]

preferences tab. check "use player filter." at least 10,000 hands played.

[goofyballer]

cmitch: 7k hands, 2.58ptbb ($1.5k)

[Triumph36]

wowwww at jeppg111, who never met a showdown he didn't like

v interesting goofy - not enough data for almost everyone to form anything conclusive, but interesting nonetheless - ty for posting. although i notice a certain 2/4 reg missing entirely...

[goofyballer]

lol, I don't play anywhere near enough hands to be on there.

[rand]

that is interesting,most of the people i would have expected to be on there are on there, but ericontilt stands out to me as either over achieving or i need to revise my opinion of him

[cmitch]

Thanks for the data. It is great stuff.

I'm curious as the start and end date of the datamine.

How often/how many tables do you datamine?