#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MAJOR VARIANCE: not for weak stomaches (graph)
this post sucks, not much variance, not a huge sample size
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MAJOR VARIANCE: not for weak stomaches (graph)
[ QUOTE ]
beat: stomach was too weak to handle the MAJOR VARIANCE in OP. feel sick now. OP, How did you survive this downswing? I mean [censored], 3 bi's, I can't even imagine what that must be like. Sometimes I lose a buyin but not usually. I don't even want to think what losing 3 would be like. [/ QUOTE ] I'm not looking at it like its 3.. im looking at it like its 8.. from the peak to bottom ldo? but w/e thats not the point, adderal and poker dont mix, im never using it again |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MAJOR VARIANCE: not for weak stomaches (graph)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Forget about this one? Yikes: Player 1 is at seat 0 with $326.75. Player 2 is at seat 1 with $208.20. bomberrussell is at seat 4 with $478.60. cfee is at seat 5 with $414.95. The button is at seat 5. Player posts the small blind of $1. Player posts the big blind of $2. bomberrussell: -- -- cfee: -- -- Pre-flop: bomberrussell calls. cfee raises to $9. Player folds. Player folds. bomberrussell calls. Flop (board: 6h 8c 9d): bomberrussell bets $21. cfee raises to $75. bomberrussell calls. Turn (board: 6h 8c 9d Kh): bomberrussell bets $171. cfee goes all-in for $330.95. bomberrussell calls. River (board: 6h 8c 9d Kh 3d): (no action in this round) Showdown: cfee shows 8s 9s. cfee has 8s 9s 8c 9d Kh: two pair, nines and eights. bomberrussell shows 7d Tc. bomberrussell has 7d Tc 6h 8c 9d: straight, ten high. Summary: $2 is raked from a pot of $832.90. bomberrussell wins $830.90 with straight, ten high. [/ QUOTE ] I vaguely remember this... I remember this was on a night I went on monkey tilt and -2000 .. are you the villian here? [/ QUOTE ] I was not the villain. I thought his pf call was horrible. You were noticably tilty this night, but I don't think we played any big pots. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MAJOR VARIANCE: not for weak stomaches (graph)
So you lost 8 buyins
horrible |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MAJOR VARIANCE: not for weak stomaches (graph)
this is the most pathetic pussy graph ive ever seen. LOL @ thread title.
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MAJOR VARIANCE: not for weak stomaches (graph)
I play NL50 and my swings are the same.
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MAJOR VARIANCE: not for weak stomaches (graph)
here's a goddamn swing
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MAJOR VARIANCE: not for weak stomaches (graph)
Full Tilt Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.50/$1 Blinds - 6 Players - (LegoPoker HH Converter)
SB: $16.50 BB: $78.40 UTG: $78.85 Hero (MP): $115.15 CO: $229.70 BTN: $39.00 Preflop: Hero is dealt 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (6 Players) UTG folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $3.50</font>, <font color="red">CO raises to $10.50</font>, 3 folds, Hero calls $7.00 Flop: ($22.50) 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players) Hero checks, <font color="red">CO bets $14.00</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $45.00</font>, CO calls $31.00 Turn: ($112.50) 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">Hero bets all-in for $59.65</font>, CO calls $59.65 River: ($231.80) 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 All-In) Pot Size: $231.80 ($3 Rake) CO had A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (a full house, Queens full of Aces) and WON (+$113.65) Hero had 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (a full house, Fours full of Queens) and LOST (-$115.15) |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MAJOR VARIANCE: not for weak stomaches (graph)
I once lost 30-35 buyins or so at 1/2. I almost pity you. But not really.
|
|
|