Stars 200NL: AK reraised pot vs. nit

[Nielsio]

[ QUOTE ]
those saying call, cc river, its such bad advice.

try to think about it in a longterm and understand why paying off is soooo bad versus a nit here. nits will check behind AQ, so now we're against a set or a pp that is bluffing.

now consider how often a nit will not show the goods in these spots, and consider how that factors into your metagame when you're making these dumb payoffs.

ofc u show "but if i fold, he will always bluff me here". BUT HE'S A NIT. he doesnt ever have enough hands in his range to make them into bluffs anyways. ppl then turn this into an excuse of "he's gotta NOT HAVE it eventually!". WRONGGGGG.

[/ QUOTE ]


You conveniently left out AK

[cs3]

i didnt read the above replies but i saw this post and somehow read it as:
[ QUOTE ]
those saying call, cc river, its such bad advice.

try to think about it in a longterm and understand why paying off is soooo bad versus a nit here. nits will check behind AQ, so now we're against a set or a pp that is bluffing.

now consider how often a nit will not show the goods in these spots, and consider how that FGators into your metagame when you're making these dumb payoffs.

ofc u show "but if i fold, he will always bluff me here". BUT HE'S A NIT. he doesnt ever have enough hands in his range to make them into bluffs anyways. ppl then turn this into an excuse of "he's gotta NOT HAVE it eventually!". WRONGGGGG.

[/ QUOTE ]
..but somehow it still made perfect sense

[Bukem_]

Those saying c/c are probably ignoring bet sizes. If he bets 3/4 pot on turn, then shoves turn its a call. Nits don't 1/2 pot 3 streets in a row as a bluff ever, or with worse for value.

[Bukem_]

Also, seriously how embarrassing is it to have TeddyKGB the maniac as your screen name, yet you are the biggest vagina ever.