|
View Poll Results: Biggest pot won online | |||
$100 or less | 11 | 18.64% | |
$100-$500 | 16 | 27.12% | |
$500-$1000 | 9 | 15.25% | |
$1000-$5000 | 14 | 23.73% | |
$5000+ | 9 | 15.25% | |
Voters: 59. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerFink\'s 2007 NFC Rankings (Week 8)
I think the Eagles are gonna beat Dallas this weekend, which is going to make the NFC East even more interesting (which is saying a lot).
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerFink\'s 2007 NFC Rankings (Week 8)
[ QUOTE ]
also, not to be an ass, but i am going to rub this in your face for a while. i've been calling for the saints to be up here for three weeks now. [/ QUOTE ] you mean after what could have been considered a fluke win against Seattle, a squeaker at home over Atlanta, and now a win against a Bottom 3 team in the whole league? Rub away. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerFink\'s 2007 NFC Rankings (Week 8)
[ QUOTE ]
I think the Eagles are gonna beat Dallas this weekend, which is going to make the NFC East even more interesting (which is saying a lot). [/ QUOTE ] I have a sneaking suspicion that this is correct. [censored] Dallas! [censored] em. [censored] those [censored]. I hate you [censored] [censored] [censored] [censored] Dallas [censored] Cowgirls [censored] [censored] [censored] Romo [censored] [censored] [censored] [censored] [censored] TO [censored] [censored]. [censored] youuuuuuu! Um, I mean, Go Birds! |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerFink\'s 2007 NFC Rankings (Week 8)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm pretty sure Childress has 4 bad challanges in 2 weeks now. [/ QUOTE ] What were the ones last week? I didn't see the game. [/ QUOTE ] I know he challenged a 2nd and goal, 1 yard TD run that looked like a TD on TV, but I can't remember another one now. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerFink\'s 2007 NFC Rankings (Week 8)
nice rankings
I said Pats, Pats -6.5, New Orleans, and win the division (obv) |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerFink\'s 2007 NFC Rankings (Week 8)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I'm pretty sure Childress has 4 bad challanges in 2 weeks now. [/ QUOTE ] What were the ones last week? I didn't see the game. [/ QUOTE ] I know he challenged a 2nd and goal, 1 yard TD run that looked like a TD on TV, but I can't remember another one now. [/ QUOTE ] honestly it feels like he gets EVERY DECISON wrong, the entire game |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerFink\'s 2007 NFC Rankings (Week 8)
According to Easterbrook (who really needs to be fired. His anti-Pats bias is revolting), Childress challenged the ruling that Peterson stepped out at the 1-yard line on a punt/kickoff as opposed to inside the end zone for a touchback, when it was clear the call was correct.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerFink\'s 2007 NFC Rankings (Week 8)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] also, not to be an ass, but i am going to rub this in your face for a while. i've been calling for the saints to be up here for three weeks now. [/ QUOTE ] you mean after what could have been considered a fluke win against Seattle, a squeaker at home over Atlanta, and now a win against a Bottom 3 team in the whole league? Rub away. [/ QUOTE ] who cares who they were playing or what was a fluke win or how much they won by, results are results, and thats all that matters for these rankings. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerFink\'s 2007 NFC Rankings (Week 8)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] also, not to be an ass, but i am going to rub this in your face for a while. i've been calling for the saints to be up here for three weeks now. [/ QUOTE ] you mean after what could have been considered a fluke win against Seattle, a squeaker at home over Atlanta, and now a win against a Bottom 3 team in the whole league? Rub away. [/ QUOTE ] who cares who they were playing or what was a fluke win or how much they won by, results are results, and thats all that matters for these rankings. [/ QUOTE ] So you've been saying since the Saints were 0-4 that they should be ranked in the middle of the pack. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerFink\'s 2007 NFC Rankings (Week 8)
[ QUOTE ]
results are results, and thats all that matters for these rankings. [/ QUOTE ] If results are results then why were you saying they were decent when they were 0-4? At least be consistent. |
|
|