Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > MTT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: What's my plan ?
Swallow it and check fold 11 21.57%
Check call and try to win a showdown as cheap as possible 6 11.76%
Fire two barrels and give up 13 25.49%
eep firing to the end AK is quite a hand on that flop heads-up 3 5.88%
Something diffrent (please specify) 4 7.84%
I dunno but I would like to see the results 14 27.45%
Voters: 51. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-03-2007, 11:05 PM
VespaRally VespaRally is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 342
Default 180 Man Ballers: General Theoretical Question

I can’t remember the exact stack sizes, but I had been playing somewhat aggressively and really active the last few hands. The table had been playing really passive since we were close to the bubble. There were ~ 22 left.

I was UTG with like 25-30 BBs or something and opened to 3x with A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. It folded around to the BB who I had no reads on and no stats. He moved in for his whole stack, giving me 8-to-5 for my money. If I called and lost, I would be crippled.

My initial read was that he probably had something like 88 or better and that he wouldn’t be moving over the top with many worse unpaired hands than mine, if at all. I gave him the benefit of the doubt and mucked, realizing that it was pretty close if that was a good estimate of his range. Also, as I said, I had been stealing blinds pretty easily so I didn’t really want to take a close gamble just yet.

After doing some analysis though, I feel that this should be called and that it isn’t close. The reason is that if he does have this range 100% of the time it is only a small mistake. But let’s say instead of 7% of all hands, he is much looser and will move with like any pair, A8s or better, ATo+ and some suited Broadway cards (14% of all hands). If he moves with this range only 5% of the time, my call becomes +EV, worth a few chips.

If he moves in with that range a quarter of the time, a call is worth 40 chips.

Later on, he open-shoved w/ 25o UTG for like 12BBs 7-handed and I realized after the fact how huge AJs was against this guy. Granted, it’s a lot different than him moving over the top of my UTG raise, but it still has to lead to some doubt about how often I can be confident that he is moving in with a range that makes my call a mistake with AJs.

Sometimes I’m in the zone and I have a good read on all the players and will insta-call with AJs getting 8-to-5, but this time, readless, I definitely made a mistake by mucking. Against the general 180-man players, is this ever not a mistake?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-03-2007, 11:28 PM
markbris markbris is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: attempting to pwn the mids
Posts: 708
Default Re: 180 Man Ballers: General Theoretical Question

I think its a big mistake to call personally. No reason to gamble here I don't think. Yea he could be a moron but you dont know that yet and the fact that he pushed on your UTG raise wiht a stack that was not short at all. I think this is the biggest factor and I think you have to fold. I guess it depends on whether you think people are morons until proven otherwise or the opposite.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-03-2007, 11:36 PM
Hello Nasty Hello Nasty is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 49
Default Re: 180 Man Ballers: General Theoretical Question

Fold. If the 25o hand happened 1st I would probably call.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-04-2007, 12:47 AM
kenny7 kenny7 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: donking of money
Posts: 225
Default Re: 180 Man Ballers: General Theoretical Question

I'd fold here,a call is too much of a gamble imo.Even tho he moved w his 2-5,I would think he would respect your UTG raise enough to have a good hand here,unless of course,you'd been pushing like crazy. Another reason for folding is,like you said,table is pretty tight as you are close to bubble,in my experience,this is when people tighten up big time. Was his 2-5 push before or after you were in the money? If after,then i'm even more certain that this is a fold.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-04-2007, 10:23 AM
APipeDream APipeDream is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Shire
Posts: 414
Default Re: 180 Man Ballers: General Theoretical Question

With no reads, I'd say you're outkicked, against a pair, etc. Basically, an unknown "standard range" beats you most of the time here. Fold.

For your second question about it being a mistake, it is absolutely necessary to call this sometimes...actually, a lot of the time. Just not here.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-04-2007, 10:30 AM
Salmo Trutta Salmo Trutta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 142
Default Re: 180 Man Ballers: General Theoretical Question

Fold for all of the above reasons.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-04-2007, 10:48 AM
gcDanno gcDanno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 417
Default Re: 180 Man Ballers: General Theoretical Question

Easy Fold. 50% of the time you are going to see AK here. You are probably a favorite close to ZERO pct of the time in my experience. In a full table, I fold AJ preflop utg here most of the time.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-04-2007, 11:30 AM
APipeDream APipeDream is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Shire
Posts: 414
Default Re: 180 Man Ballers: General Theoretical Question

[ QUOTE ]
In a full table, I fold AJ preflop utg here most of the time.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you do this on the bubble of a 180-man MTT, please let me know when you play. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

You absolutely have to be pushing the people who have no understanding of playing the bubble, and raising MORE hands UTG is necessary here, not less. You will build a very good stack this way going into the $$$. You also have a MUCH better feel of the other player's holding if you get pushed back. This is the time to completely take over the table if at all possible.

And actually, I'm guessing you woudn't put that in this situation given the fact that it's not a full table (22 left), but more like 6 or 7 handed.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-04-2007, 11:58 AM
Sherman Sherman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ph. D. School
Posts: 3,999
Default Re: 180 Man Ballers: General Theoretical Question

Its actually difficult to tell what the specific action was.

Exactly how big was his stack? How much would you have been left with if you called and lost?

What do you mean by UTG? 7 or 8 handed?

All important information.

Anyhow, I often raise with AJ with the intention of folding to re-raises by deep stacks or big shoves.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-04-2007, 03:51 PM
gcDanno gcDanno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 417
Default Re: 180 Man Ballers: General Theoretical Question

Yes, i did say Full table.

As for the bubble of a 20/180, how many people really care? I know that I don't. Heck, I'm much more likely to resteal at this time, especially against a player that is trying to "control" the table. For the 20/180s, the top 3 are the only spots that matter. I'd rather have 1 top 3 finish and 2 bubbles, than 3 that finish in the 10-18 range.

While I'm not #1 in 20/180s (shaundeeb), I'm pretty satified with my results (sharkscope is your friend).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.