|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU Blinds are 250/500 ($5)
Think about how often he's folding his weaker hands, your win % when called, and the fact that folding costs x chips, and you'll see why shoving wide is goooooot in hand 1.
Hand 2, 5 blinds, heads up, a pair, all in gooooooooot, dont bring that weak [censored] in my house crystal. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU Blinds are 250/500 ($5)
"SAGE recommends jamming with 87s only if the short stack has 6BB or less."
Really? I don't believe sage counts straights so it underrates shoving with sooted connectors. Edit: Ooops, criticized crystal's article but was wrong [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img], apparently sage is only good for 7 blinds or less which is weird. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU Blinds are 250/500 ($5)
[ QUOTE ]
"SAGE recommends jamming with 87s only if the short stack has 6BB or less." Really? I don't believe sage counts straights so it underrates shoving with sooted connectors. [/ QUOTE ] Rake - the point is that 76s is worth 22 "points," meaning you push with 6BB or less. Not the exact value of 76s. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU Blinds are 250/500 ($5)
WTF? Hero has 87s, not 76s, and can be pushed for over 20 BBs, and called for 6.5, per Nash EQ, of which sage is a quick approximation-- though with 7 bbs, you can shove just about *almost* anything suited, andy hand with a Queen in it or better, J7o+, T7o+, 98o.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU Blinds are 250/500 ($5)
I like both.
I only fold 1st if I saw him call previous pushes with Q6 / J8 of something like that. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU Blinds are 250/500 ($5)
[ QUOTE ]
dont bring that weak [censored] in my house crystal. [/ QUOTE ] lol That article is a review of SAGE. The authors didn't like it. At the bottom are reviews of other systems including Sklansky's and Scott Fischman's SNG strategy. It looks like Sklansky's was best. |
|
|