Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-29-2007, 10:25 AM
HoogusTheChef HoogusTheChef is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 25
Default How Tight are Full Tilt players?

I was thinking about depositing at Full Tilt, but I noticed that the viewed flop percentages are in the 20%. I play at Bodog and the % are no less than 40.

Is it extremely tight play there? Are PS, UB, and AP this tight.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-29-2007, 10:27 AM
Zues Zues is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 27
Default Re: How Tight are Full Tilt players?

FT is VERY tight. STAY AWAY!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-29-2007, 10:28 AM
dersl dersl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 538
Default Re: How Tight are Full Tilt players?

Why dont you tell us which games you play...would help a lot
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-29-2007, 10:48 AM
grouchie grouchie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: FPPs - I collect \'em
Posts: 4,301
Default Re: How Tight are Full Tilt players?

full tilt players are so tight that even a big turd causes immense pain
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-29-2007, 10:51 AM
HandHack1 HandHack1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 137
Default Re: How Tight are Full Tilt players?

Play at UB, FT players are tight and the support sucks. UB I see is at 50 sometimes 70
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-29-2007, 11:05 AM
HoogusTheChef HoogusTheChef is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 25
Default Re: How Tight are Full Tilt players?

Sorry I mostly play NL smalls takes NL 25, NL 50 and some 7 Card HI. I have built up about $800 in Bodog and was trying to find a new site with a good deposit bonus (Fulltilt $650) to join. I'm a U.S. citizen and I like the action on Bodog, but HATE the software. You think UB or AP is the best bet?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-29-2007, 11:08 AM
eleventy eleventy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: St Louis MO
Posts: 488
Default Re: How Tight are Full Tilt players?

Mke sure you get Rakeback if you sign up at FT...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-29-2007, 11:27 AM
mocky mocky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Take off,eh
Posts: 341
Default Re: How Tight are Full Tilt players?

FT is tighter than a nuns knickers, however the sign up bonus at AP and UB sucks for small stakes you could try cake but ive heard their software is pretty bad.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-29-2007, 11:33 AM
hime hime is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bill & Jimmy died for our sins
Posts: 989
Default Re: How Tight are Full Tilt players?

They're not tight at PLO8...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-29-2007, 12:15 PM
Wahoo73 Wahoo73 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: HOTLANTA
Posts: 624
Default Re: How Tight are Full Tilt players?

[ QUOTE ]
...and some 7 Card HI.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you join FTP, then play a lot of 7 card stud. That's what I do. 4th street seen percentages generally are as follows:

$.50/1: ~50%
$1/2: ~45%
$2/4: ~45%
$3/6: ~40%
$5/10: ~40%

Also, although the betting structure for stud at FTP takes a little getting used to (big ante/small BI/big completion), I like it better than stud structure at PS (small ante/big BI/small completion) because a completion at FTP actually has a better chance of achieving the desired effect of "thinning the field" and makes winning pots prior to the river more profitable than at PS.

Also, while stud game availability at FTP is not quite as large as at PS, you can still find plenty of games.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.