TT > JJ ?

[JJack]

HU - PF
J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img],J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] vs A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img],A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] - 19.36%
T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img],T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] vs A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img],A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] - 19.77%

Can you tell me why TT>JJ ??? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

I have use it:
http://www.cardplayer.com/poker_odds/texas_holdem

I have one idea.
TT will make one more straight then JJ (JQKAx - is impossible)

[b1grich]

give me JJ over TT all day ... something has to be wrong lol

[infinity235]

This belongs to the Probability forum.

Yes, TT makes one more straight and makes more straight without the ace.

The post topic should read "TT > JJ vs AA?".

[dwf76]

Just out of curiousity why does 8,8 have the best % chance against A,A.

[btmagnetw]

straights

[Tom1975]

[ QUOTE ]
Just out of curiousity why does 8,8 have the best % chance against A,A.

[/ QUOTE ]

Eights, Sevens, and Sixes all can make the same number of straights against AA, but Eights are less easily counterfitted. For example, on a 87776 board, 88 beats AA, but 66 loses.

[kyro]

So to OP, think about this. You must think that KQ > AK because KQ has better equity over AA than AK does.

[PantsOnFire]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Just out of curiousity why does 8,8 have the best % chance against A,A.

[/ QUOTE ]

Eights, Sevens, and Sixes all can make the same number of straights against AA, but Eights are less easily counterfitted. For example, on a 87776 board, 88 beats AA, but 66 loses.

[/ QUOTE ]
But 99 makes the same number of straights as 88, so what gives there?

[rufus]

[ QUOTE ]

But 99 makes the same number of straights as 88, so what gives there?

[/ QUOTE ]

99 looses the broadway straight

[insyder19]

That's interesting.

Sure qk is better than AK against AA because you have 2 live cards.