October Session Review Signup Thread

[kav]

I want to participate. It's my first time and I play full ring.

[OziBattler]

[ QUOTE ]
blzrd,

are you going to even acknowledge the review i did of your last session before signing up for a new one?

[/ QUOTE ]

typically if people dont fullfill their obligations for a review then they shouldnt signup or get paired up until they complete their previous one. blizzard, if you indeed did receive hands from tyler and didnt review them and send your comments then the right thing to do is to finish your obligation with them before signing up. if it was a one way review where you agreed beforehand that tyler would just review your hands then you should at least have some dialogue with him....tyler probably doesnt NEED your approval of the review but he did it and you dont want to look like it was all give and no take.

ozi aka former review organiser

ps same goes for Nick D who never fullfilled his end of the bargain when I last reviewed him

[arch_angel]

in for full ring.

[Ulkis]

I'm in for FR, although I haven't fully studied the previous one yet and have been funning with NL for a while, which is going very well at the moment by the way. I got $30 bonus from party which I can use for this.

[BadBigBabar]

bump

[n1_pete]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
blzrd,

are you going to even acknowledge the review i did of your last session before signing up for a new one?

[/ QUOTE ]

typically if people dont fullfill their obligations for a review then they shouldnt signup or get paired up until they complete their previous one. blizzard, if you indeed did receive hands from tyler and didnt review them and send your comments then the right thing to do is to finish your obligation with them before signing up. if it was a one way review where you agreed beforehand that tyler would just review your hands then you should at least have some dialogue with him....tyler probably doesnt NEED your approval of the review but he did it and you dont want to look like it was all give and no take.

ozi aka former review organiser

ps same goes for Nick D who never fullfilled his end of the bargain when I last reviewed him

[/ QUOTE ]

Oz - just re-read the FAQ. is the confidential scoring still required? if so i have a few to send on.

"Currently the Tiering works as follows:

1) At the conclusion of the review I request that each reviewer send me a BRIEF confidental rating of the other reviewer. Please score your fellow reviewer as follows:
0 = no review done or was of a very poor standard
1 = Review was reasonable and/or reviewer made a good attempt
2 = Review was very good to excellent.


2) Each participant gets awarded AussiePoints as follows:
1) 1 point for each review done (assuming review score was not zero)
2) 0-2 points for each Review for which a rating was recieved (see above)
3) 1 point for providing a Review Score and/or review feedback
3) 1 point per 1000 forum posts
4) Bonus points at my discretion

2) For each review session, the partipants are separated into 2 groups/tiers based on their current Aussie Points total. Within each group the pairings are done randomly using RAND function in excel."

[OziBattler]

umm, well I honestly dont know whether BBB is using a scoring system or not any more so i defer the answer to him. in anycase the scoring system was always encouraged by me but never mandatory (cos that would be stoopid) so you dont HAVE to send in any feedback to BBB. Of course, any scoring would be confidential but if 'accidental' outings of people who grossly fail to live up to their end of the bargain happens then BBB/I cant be held responsible [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

I probably should update the FAQ but I will need to hear from BBB to find out how he is running them these days

thanks for the question though

ozi

[tyler_cracker]

i don't know if babar is using rankings, but i do know that people who flake on their commitments will not be rewarded.

even if they make new posts asking for help with their leaks, blzdwrth.

[S. L.]

i'm in.

[Xylocain]

I just assumed the session review sheriff kept track of rouge reviewers. Are we talking about people not sending feedback or people just skipping out on their part of the review?

(no way I'm wasting 2h on a review for someone who effed upp before)