dan bright in midstakes

[Gildwulf]

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...;gonew=1#UNREAD

What are mod thoughts on this considering his recent ban? It seems like midstakes just took him back like nothing happened...they even refer to him as Dan in the thread.

[RR]

They call him Dan. Is it clearly Dan? Did he state someplace that he is Dan? I was thinking someplace it was spelled out that a banned/suspended user while able to create a new account and "start over" isn't supposed ot reveal that he is a banned user.

[Gildwulf]

it makes sense, his posting is v similar. The only reason I even put the two and two together (I casually read midstakes) is that he made some comment about tuff fish's daughter in bbv.

[iron81]

The rule is unless they admit it they are allowed to post. I'm almost certain that one of the most valuable contributors to my forum was previously banned. We might put a note that he might be Dan, but I say let it go. Have you asked Yves why he thinks its Dan?

[Dids]

[ QUOTE ]
The rule is unless they admit it they are allowed to post.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not, it's not. Not even close.

[iron81]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The rule is unless they admit it they are allowed to post.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not, it's not. Not even close.

[/ QUOTE ]
Then what is the rule? Its not like we go around banning people who behave themselves just because we suspect that their old account was banned.

[Dids]

Iron,

1- you can use tools, like ip look up and such to confirm.

2- when it posts like a Dan Bright, and references Dan Bright stuff, I think it's fair to make some assumptions that it's a Dan Bright.

3- If it IS a Dan Bright, given all the conversation that's taken place here, we shouldn't be waiting for him to screw up to drop the hammer.

[Nick B.]

Permaban

[Mat Sklansky]

if this is him, i want him gone forever.

[Mat Sklansky]

ips checked. he's gone.