|
|
#1
10-12-2007, 02:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
villain is 56/12/3 over 400 hands.. He's obviously pretty ridiculous, and I expect him to put in more action earlier if he has a better hand. I assume he's bad enough to pay off with worse 9's, and it seems unlikely he has a better hand, right?
No Limit Holdem Ring game Blinds: $3/$6 5 players Converter Stack sizes: UTG: $613.00 CO: $661.00 Hero: $582.00 SB: $2.329.75 BB: $1.382.90 Pre-flop: (5 players) Hero is Button with K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 2 folds, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $24</font>, SB folds, BB calls. Flop: 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ($51, 2 players) BB checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $40</font>, BB calls. Turn: 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ($131, 2 players) BB checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $102</font>, BB calls. River: 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($335, 2 players) BB checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $148</font> 
|
|
#3
10-12-2007, 02:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
Yeah $200 looks good. Maybe pot the river if he is the kind of fish who always interprets big bets as bluffs and will call with a draw that hit a pair or some crap.
|
|
#4
10-12-2007, 02:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
i like around 250 or so. He'll find a call somehow.
|
|
#5
10-12-2007, 03:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
I'd be a little concerned at someone whose AF is 3 suddenly being so passive. I'd think you'd be beaten here (set or a crazy pair) more often then you'll be called.
The way he's been playing, you should get better shots at his stack then this.
|
|
#6
10-12-2007, 03:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
i can see $100, $200 or $265 all as possibilities. not really sure what to make of $150
edit: actually i dont like 100 too much after looking back. $200-265 feels right
|
|
#9
10-12-2007, 05:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
This is not thin, this is standard......not betting here vs this guy is criminal. I also like betting a bit more, like $199.
|
|
#10
10-12-2007, 05:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
[ QUOTE ]
This is not thin, this is standard......not betting here vs this guy is criminal. I also like betting a bit more, like $199. [/ QUOTE ]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
