30inch or 2 20 inch ?

[hoho]

what is the best to play 8 tables a 30inch or 2 20inch ?

[thing85]

2 20 inch ones are probably cheaper and give you more space...I think.

[kcheel]

Can also play 9 (or 12 at a decent size) on just one 24" with 1920x1600 resolution. Thats assuming you are playing somewhere with resizable tables.

[Variance God]

[ QUOTE ]
2 20 inch ones are probably cheaper and give you more space...I think.

[/ QUOTE ]


no they dont give you more space

they give you the same space

[lucky_mf]

I went with one 30" and am very happy with my choice.

Lucky

[thing85]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
2 20 inch ones are probably cheaper and give you more space...I think.

[/ QUOTE ]


no they dont give you more space

they give you the same space

[/ QUOTE ]

Okay...same space, less money.

[Variance God]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
2 20 inch ones are probably cheaper and give you more space...I think.

[/ QUOTE ]


no they dont give you more space

they give you the same space

[/ QUOTE ]

Okay...same space, less money.

[/ QUOTE ]

i have two 30" personally. the 30" are just more steamlined and easy to use. i can keep all my poker tables on the same monitor, move them around easily, etc

[Tryptamean]

I have a 30" and a 1600x1200 20" secondary monitor in portrait mode. You can fit 9 tables on the 30" easily or even 12 at a reasonable size. That leave the second monitor for 2p2, chat, PT etc.

Seems like 2 30s would be overkill.

[-zero-]

I'm happy with dual 24".

[thing85]

I use a 20.1" and it works well for 9-tabling (resizable tables on Stars). At first I thought the tables were too small, but now that I'm used to it, I would never go back to large tables.