Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Business, Finance, and Investing
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-08-2007, 06:08 AM
superadvisor superadvisor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 516
Default Re: countrywide (aka enron) cans 12k employees

Hey guys you are forgetting they company officials say that the job cuts may be smaller if the market improves.... (sarcasm)

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1189..._us_whats_news
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-08-2007, 06:14 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Post deleted by Mat Sklansky

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-08-2007, 06:24 AM
superadvisor superadvisor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 516
Default Re: countrywide (aka enron) cans 12k employees

blueman, because there is a very good chance the company is going to go under. The CEO already sold all $450 million of his shares, that shows you how much confidence the public should have.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-08-2007, 08:58 AM
Fishhead24 Fishhead24 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,196
Default Re: countrywide (aka enron) cans 12k employees

Countrywide's strategy is to rely on its savings bank to provide funding for lending. That funding comes from deposits, as well as borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank system. The goal is to end reliance on short-term borrowings from jittery Wall Street firms and other creditors.

THIS WOULD BE ME.....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-09-2007, 01:05 AM
pig4bill pig4bill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,658
Default Re: countrywide (aka enron) cans 12k employees

[ QUOTE ]
I really don't get it. Usually when a company fires a bunch of people the market reacts to that positively and the stock goes up. Why is it a bad thing in this instance?

[/ QUOTE ]

Because the reason they are laying off so many people is they are closing branches and processing centers. If this company somehow survives, it will be much smaller than it was.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-09-2007, 09:14 AM
adios adios is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,132
Default Re: countrywide (aka enron) cans 12k employees

One thing not mentioned is that it's obvious that even if CFC survives and resolves it's short term funding issues, they'll be significantly de-leveraged and doing a lot less loan production which means earnings will be way, way down if existent at all.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-09-2007, 09:28 AM
superadvisor superadvisor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 516
Default Re: countrywide (aka enron) cans 12k employees

I'm very skeptical of Countrywides long term potential. Lending looks very bleak for the future and it seems that any and all lending for the coming years will have to be break even lending where the borrower gets a FAIR rate and the lender gets a TINY profit and I just don't see the volume or the quality of borrowers needed to make this fair lending market profitable for lenders.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-09-2007, 09:37 AM
Fishhead24 Fishhead24 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,196
Default Re: countrywide (aka enron) cans 12k employees

Meanwhile they keep paying 5.4% to customers for their savings.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-09-2007, 09:42 AM
adios adios is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,132
Default Re: countrywide (aka enron) cans 12k employees

[ QUOTE ]
Meanwhile they keep paying 5.4% to customers for their savings.

[/ QUOTE ]

That may change though and eventually will. Lenders leverage the spread between short term and long term rates so I think develeraging is going to hurt CFC earnings alot.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-09-2007, 10:03 AM
superadvisor superadvisor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 516
Default Re: countrywide (aka enron) cans 12k employees

I agree with adios. It's easy for Countrywide to give 5.4% interest on money when the money they are paying out in interest <u>DOESN'T EVEN EXIST</u> they are paying it out in debt and are only allowed to pay out the money because they are betting on their own survival, they are claiming that the money will exist at some point in the future. THE EXACT SAME THING HAPPENED IN ENRON. By lying to the public they were allowed to perpetuate the image that their company was worth $30+ something per share, once the whole ship had sank it was evident that those shares were only worth a few cents in real world money. wiki: MARK TO MARKET. The company MARKS their price and the market ASSUMES it to be true (until proven otherwise).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.