#51
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3/6 OOP with a plan
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Big Jim: uh.. what? I have to make ~$200 on the river on average to compensate for a $96 turn peel? Are you high? [/ QUOTE ] Feel free to point out where you see an error in my calcs. I am not above making an occasional mistake. Also, yes, I was slightly high when I made that post. [/ QUOTE ] lol |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3/6 OOP with a plan
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Getting only 2.5:1, you need to make ~$200 on the river, playing just for your draw. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't even possible if I had 0% equity. [/ QUOTE ] Wow. [/ QUOTE ] Demonstrate a situation where I need to make $y on the river in order to make up for a $x sized turn call where y > x. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3/6 OOP with a plan
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Getting only 2.5:1, you need to make ~$200 on the river, playing just for your draw. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't even possible if I had 0% equity. [/ QUOTE ] Wow. [/ QUOTE ] Demonstrate a situation where I need to make $y on the river in order to make up for a $x sized turn call where y > x. [/ QUOTE ] if you are a 4:1 dog, and you are getting only 2.5:1 from the pot, playing only for your draw, you need to make 1.5x the turn bet, on the river, when you hit |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3/6 OOP with a plan
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] ^^^^^^^yep^^^^^^^ [/ QUOTE ] Maybe this guy should take over I'm sure he scrutinized the calculations carefully [/ QUOTE ] Awesome. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3/6 OOP with a plan
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Getting only 2.5:1, you need to make ~$200 on the river, playing just for your draw. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't even possible if I had 0% equity. [/ QUOTE ] Wow. [/ QUOTE ] Demonstrate a situation where I need to make $y on the river in order to make up for a $x sized turn call where y > x. [/ QUOTE ] if you are a 4:1 dog, and you are getting only 2.5:1 from the pot, playing only for your draw, you need to make 1.5x the turn bet, on the river, when you hit [/ QUOTE ] Ok pot is $100. Guy bets $66.67. I call as an 80/20 dog. The EV of my turn call is 0.2*(66.67+100) - 0.8*66.67 = -$20 |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3/6 OOP with a plan
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Getting only 2.5:1, you need to make ~$200 on the river, playing just for your draw. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't even possible if I had 0% equity. [/ QUOTE ] Wow. [/ QUOTE ] Demonstrate a situation where I need to make $y on the river in order to make up for a $x sized turn call where y > x. [/ QUOTE ] if you are a 4:1 dog, and you are getting only 2.5:1 from the pot, playing only for your draw, you need to make 1.5x the turn bet, on the river, when you hit [/ QUOTE ] Ok pot is $100. Guy bets $66.67. I call as an 80/20 dog. The EV of my turn call is 0.2*(66.67+100) - 0.8*66.67 = -$20 [/ QUOTE ] ok.. so if you get a 66.67*1.5 = $100 bet from him on the river: 0.2*(66.67+100+100) - 0.8*66.67 = 0 |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3/6 OOP with a plan
you're right
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3/6 OOP with a plan
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] ^^^^^^^yep^^^^^^^ [/ QUOTE ] Maybe this guy should take over I'm sure he scrutinized the calculations carefully [/ QUOTE ] Don't feel like 'taking over'. You seem readily convinced that your line/plan is the best so no need to go further. And your statement about this not being true even if you had 0% equity is just plain wrong. There has been more then enough posts for your reasoning to be shown flawed but you stay stubborn. And I have yet to see any calculations from you as to why your plan is +EV in any way either. You just continue to retort every poster that replies. You are a good poster when you want to be but that goes the same for you sucking. Maybe tomorrow will be a good day. |
|
|