Help understanding my graph

[HesseJam]

These graphs are always difficult to interpret. Yours is somewhat typical for many Full Ring Players (with the green line being way below the others). You could be drawing too much, drawing with enough odds but not getting there, folding too much, not raising too much preflop, etc.

For gauging your luck factor you'll have to switch to the luck graphs, net line.

Better use PokerEV for hand analysis with filters.

[Body Man D]

[ QUOTE ]
These graphs are always difficult to interpret. Yours is somewhat typical for many Full Ring Players (with the green line being way below the others).

[/ QUOTE ]

Why would this be the case?? I've heard the argument before that in full ring you can expect the green line(total winnings) to be below the blue line(showdown winnings). But if you took 9 people and had them play a session and then combined all the graphs, wouldn't the 2 lines be the same??

Also in Super System, Doyle mentions that he is usually a dog in hands that get to showdown but more than makes up for it by winning a ton of smaller pots. Wouldn't this put his green line above the blue line?

[ActionStan]

I don't think it's true at all. Passive players, who there are more of in full ring by its nature, rely more on shown down pots. But, there are plenty of attacking full ring players with their green line above their blue. For example:


By actionstan at 2007-11-21

I'm not clear that the equity adjusted number is all that meaningful beyond all in before the river. You can have all sorts of equity in the hand at some point and still call bad. I don't know. I do think that all-in before the river will tell you if you're getting you're money in good in big pots:


By ActionStan at 2007-11-21