#1
|
|||
|
|||
UB vs. FTP- mid limits NLCASH
Has anyone played both UB and FTP HU cash games, around the 600nl-2000nl level? I'm wondering if there's a big difference in the level of play on both sites.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: UB vs. FTP- mid limits
Are the HUSNGs still populated?
If so what limits get regular action and how is the structure/skill? And I know this third question belongs in Internet Gambling, but if anybody knows have they resolved their cashout issues? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: UB vs. FTP- mid limits
HU SnG's are pretty barren, but if you are the one signing up at the 100's and lower you will get games, and the players are very bad. (UB that is, I haven't checked out FTP)
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: UB vs. FTP- mid limits
I played a lot of HUSNGs on UB (btw, do you say "on UB" or "at UB"? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] ).
They have 3 types of HUSNGs: Regular (10 minute blind-levels), Turbo (5 minutes) and Super-Turbo (2.5 minutes). The software ist very fast, you can play much more hands/hour than on FTP or stars. I only played 30s and below there, traffic was okay (0-2 minutes waiting time in average) and most opponents are much worse then on stars. One bad thing is that you dont get rakeback from SNGs. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: UB vs. FTP- mid limits
Jiganti asked a question relating for cash games. It is good that you told for SNG's also, but I am also interested in cash games. Any insight?
|
|
|