|
|
#21
10-30-2007, 07:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blunty: 24k at 1/2NL in month.
You can send it to me if you trust me more...
Though yes, I think this is a stupid bet that can be easily faked. It would be preeeetay, prrrreetay easy for blunty to delete/not import the big hands he lost. MY SUGGESTION: Blunty emails stars for the months hand histories. Stars provides a login and password to their web server (or whatver you call it... an FTP?). Blunty gives this password/login to an unbiased party and THEY do the import. Also, confirm we are talking about net profit here. I made $100k this month, but lost $90k. Just so you don't end up arguing over semantics. 
|
|
#22
10-30-2007, 07:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Blunty: 24k at 1/2NL in month.
[ QUOTE ]
the fact that he claims hes never bought pokertracker for any sane reason at all is ammusing. [/ QUOTE ] For some reason I have more tropuoble beoiveing he has no hand tracking software at all than he made the monies. Blunty has been playing allo tthis month if he put in a hellish amount of hands and ran well...................... Also wouldn't it better for blunty to get the hh's then send them to someone else to import so there is no question of dr'ing them?
|
|
#23
10-30-2007, 07:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Blunty: 24k at 1/2NL in month.
The fact that he says he never bought PT and is making 5-6pt/100 seems odd to me too. Why not at least try it by now?
however, in blunty's defense, I would not feel comfortable sending $1500 to anyone just b/c they were a mod at a site Not to ruin the bet, or anything, but this isn't happening anyway doesn't anyone datamine anymore?
|
|
#24
10-30-2007, 07:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Blunty: 24k at 1/2NL in month.
Yeah it would be very very ez for blunty to not import say even just 20 hands where he got stacked and change the amount won significantly.
|
|
#25
10-30-2007, 07:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Blunty: 24k at 1/2NL in month.
Nope, let's do this:
Blunty. Email stars and tell them futuredoc can get your hand histories. Give them futuredoc's email and have them send the HH there. You can also have nation sent the HH if you want an unbiased source. I think this is the most fair way. Also, another way to make it true would to be to have stars support email a couple of us and tell us how much you made this month. They would have these numbers.
|
|
#27
10-30-2007, 07:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Blunty: 24k at 1/2NL in month.
To be clear, Prodigy, I think it's a very safe bet if you can find a way to get an accurate number.
Sending to futuredoc is as problematic as sending to blunty... so just send to Nation if he doesn't mind. OBV is stars will just sed out the profit #'s to randos, then that would solve everything.
|
|
#30
10-30-2007, 07:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Blunty: 24k at 1/2NL in month.
main;
Agreed and I think it may be allowed. I emailed stars and asked them if they could send my information to someone else so if they OK it then obv. the bet is on. I also think doc is a lot less likely to lie than blunty, as apparently 1500 means a lot to blunty whereas doc just wants the proof of it happening and obviously can handle having a mod hold his money. Regardless yes he should have them send a couple people, those people can pm nation(or mod of his choice), and if they all come out with the same number then nation posts it. Easy way to solve the bet
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
