full ring vs 6max no limit

[WindFallProfits]

dont know where i should post this. but whats more profitable?

[PRE]

your mom

[WindFallProfits]

thanks!

[Backspin20]

How can anyone answer that? The variables are endless. So horrible question and most likley no poker is profitable for you.

[5thStreetHog]

Ill bite..If your better than everyone else at both given tables,and can adjust your game to play eithor equally well..6max

[jkj]

5thstreet beat me to it. Bad players go broke quicker at 6 max. Good players make more money there.

[ICMoney]

Full ring if you like nits and want to wait for sets and draws to the nuts.

6-max if you enjoy playing poker.

[Self Made]

I did an analysis of this question once and FR came out more profitable. Remember, given the ability to play x amount of hands/hour (ones that you put money into), you can play more tables at FR than SH. And SH isn't that much more profitable per 100 hands. I used the Voluntary Statistics Survey, among other things, for the assumptions.

[PrimogenitoX]

Wrong. You can play more hands per hour at 6max than FR. Furthermore, it is more profitable. I have huge sample sizes at both and wish I could convert all my hours of play spent at FR over to 6max and I would be rich basically.

[jkj]

I agree, I really don't see how anyone can argue otherwise. In general the people at 6 max have more gambool in them. Self Made you need to take another look at those #'s or maybe you just have a vastly different playing style.