JUST [censored] END IT ALREADY: The EricW Thread

[Dids]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
JUST [censored] END IT ALREADY

[/ QUOTE ]

lol ironyments

[/ QUOTE ]

To be clear, this was the title of a PM I got from a poster on this subject. It's not so indicitive of my feelings on the issue.

[goofyballer]

[ QUOTE ]
Lol trollaments, EricW has won this match 6-0.

[/ QUOTE ]

Can we ban this guy too? He must be EricW's lover or something to get this hard over all of his pathetic trolling attempts.

[rivaplaya03]

[ QUOTE ]
-to be chanted rhythmically-

ban ericw
lock all his threads
throw away the key
eat some chips
nom nom nom

[/ QUOTE ]

agreed

[En Passant]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Lol trollaments, EricW has won this match 6-0.

[/ QUOTE ]

Can we ban this guy too? He must be EricW's lover or something to get this hard over all of his pathetic trolling attempts.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agree. Anyone in support of Ivan Drago is either a terrorist or Russian.

[FlyWf]

I think chopsticks is trying to draw away mod ire by being even more retarded.

Both clearly deserve bannings. All Eric does now is make mean-spirited personal attacks on his little "Enemies List" and chopsticks is obviously someone Dids banned in the past.

[ahnuld]

gimmick is overplayed ~ ban

[prodonkey]

when is the last time ericw deleted pics of beautiful terts? Ban dids!

[kevin017]

ericw's whole routine is horrible. it would be commendable that he sticks to it, if it weren't so horrible. not funny, not aggravating, nothing to talk about afterward, but yet he doesn't break any rules. i'd still say ban.

[Phatty_One]

I don't like EricW, but I don't like Dids either. Ban plz so less posts from both of you.

[PITTM]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Meh, I think banning him just gives him what he wants.

[/ QUOTE ]

How is this not a win-win? What's he going to do, go make a stink with a gimmick in ATF about how he's being treated so unfairly and Dids gets to make his blog-type posts but EricW's are "contained" (this is just predicting how he'll word it, I don't personally give a [censored]) and this is blatant mod discrimination etc etc? And then all the people that matter on 2+2 (lol) will be like "lol nobody cares about you Eric" and we'll all get on with our merry lives, sans EricW.

He contributes nothing to the forum anymore, hasn't in a long time, and exists solely to direct mean-spirited trolling at Dids (or judging by this thread, other posters as well). He's nothing more than a bitter assclown. Ban.

[/ QUOTE ]

QFT

[ QUOTE ]
Why, because he makes fun of you? His posts are on the whole much better than any of yours. (Except any pics of you with 'rangs - those are awesome).

I think you should turn in your modship. You really are doing a horrible job.

Oh, and SAVE ERICW!

[/ QUOTE ]

While I agree with this(minus the last sentence) it has nothing to do with the last sentence and all good points are overshadowed by the final sentence.

[ QUOTE ]

Judging from Dids' attitude and the responses in this thread, it's pretty obvious at this point that he's gonna get banned. But I think that the final decision should be made by somebody other than Dids. We have six (or four, depending on how you look at it) other mods. I think that since EricW has been insulting Dids, it will be difficult for Dids to make an impartial decision about Eric's banamenting. Therefore the decision should be made by one of our other mods.


[/ QUOTE ]

QFT. Someone telling us that they are objective != someone actually being objective.

[ QUOTE ]
This completely backfired on you Dids. And, do we really want a virgin moderating BBV4L?

[/ QUOTE ]

sex 1 time>sex 0 times. Of course I can think of a politics mod who wouldnt be able to tell you either way.

edit: glad this post gets a new page like it deserves