Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-27-2007, 02:33 AM
Eddi Eddi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 71
Default AK preflop vs pair, general question

Suppose you raise 4x with AK and someone reraises you to 15x and you know for a fact they have QQ-. Would you push AI preflop? Does your answer change with position and/or opponent type?

Also what about the opposite question. Would you push with a pair PF if you knew for a fact your opponent has unpaired overcards?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-27-2007, 03:09 AM
JROK777 JROK777 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: huffin nitromethane
Posts: 736
Default Re: AK preflop vs pair, general question

Nope. You are not a favorite. I am assuming you are playing w 100bb stacks. If you short stack pushing looks better. The dead $ in the pot needs to make up for your negative pf expectation. Also, the read you are talking about is impossible to make.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-27-2007, 04:24 AM
Eddi Eddi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 71
Default Re: AK preflop vs pair, general question

I know the read is impossible to make, which is why this is a general question and not a specific hand one.

What about fold equity? Seems like you're assuming we have none.

So if you magically DO know your opponent has a pair and he 3-bets, do you fold, reraise(AI?) or call with AK?

It seems to me calling is the worst choice since you'll hit your pair only in 1/3 of the cases on flop and will have to fold to the CB + if you DO hit your pair, it's unlikely you'll get much more than the CB out of your opponent. So I'd rephrase the question - do you fold or do you 4-bet/4bAI? Do your actions change with AKo vs AKs and also OOP vs IP?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-27-2007, 04:59 AM
RoccoGe RoccoGe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 42
Default Re: AK preflop vs pair, general question

usually at low limits-says from 10nl to 25nl- every re-raise pre flop is a huge hand.

At 50 nl pre flop reraises range are wider,i guess any regular can re-raise AJ or any pair in position.

Said so,i guess that the general line is that in a re-raised pot with AK - TPTK ---> nuts.
I mean,lot of time they don't have ACES/KINGS and call you with any other thing that you beat and stack them,and half the time some donk called you with a worse hand and draw you out.
Like:
If you you re-raise someone with AK and he calls down with a pair and hit the set,he's done that with wrong odds and so did a EV- play,while you did a EV+ play.

On a flop of

K59

wich u re-raised pre flop and got called,u have no shame if going broke.no way u have to fear a set of 5s/9s or aces or kings.

That's my tought.

Rocco
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-27-2007, 05:00 AM
corsakh corsakh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kitty said what?
Posts: 3,991
Default Re: AK preflop vs pair, general question

Introduce yourself to pokerstove.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-27-2007, 05:36 AM
Panic__NL Panic__NL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Netherlands, Rotterdam
Posts: 666
Default Re: AK preflop vs pair, general question

[ QUOTE ]
Introduce yourself to pokerstove.

[/ QUOTE ]

true!

If you are sure he has QQ- shoving seeems best to me. You are a underdog against all pp, but he will fold most of them, only TT+ he will call you with probably.

A. So 22-99 are 8 pairs out of 11.
B. TT-QQ are 3 pairs out of 11, and you are a 44% dog.

A. gives you 18 * 8/11 = 13 1/11 bb

B. gives you 3/11 * 200* 44% - 200 * 56%= -6 6/11 bb

A+B= 6 6/11 BB
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.