Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-18-2007, 10:49 PM
MDoranD MDoranD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: im done with grape juice
Posts: 4,609
Default Re: he was a 79/71

[ QUOTE ]
This was a bad call on his part. Because there were two Kings and two Tens on the board, everyone in the hand has at least two pair (kings and tens). Therefore, having pocket 2s doesn't help you, because in Texas Hold'em you can only play the best 5 cards (combining the 5 board cards with your 2 community cards). In this case, if you hold pocket 2s in your hand, your best 5 card hand is actually the board (KKTT4). So at best you are splitting with someone, and they would need to hold either 43, 42, 33, 32, or 22. Of course them having 22 is unlikely because there are only two 2s left in the deck. Even if the opponent has 52, they are beating someone who holds 22, because their best 5 card hand would be KKTT5, which beats KKTT4.

That's what makes this a bad call.

[/ QUOTE ]

is that so
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-18-2007, 10:52 PM
jds1201 jds1201 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: LOL Bodog
Posts: 856
Default Re: he was a 79/71

[ QUOTE ]
This was a bad call on his part. Because there were two Kings and two Tens on the board, everyone in the hand has at least two pair (kings and tens). Therefore, having pocket 2s doesn't help you, because in Texas Hold'em you can only play the best 5 cards (combining the 5 board cards with your 2 community cards). In this case, if you hold pocket 2s in your hand, your best 5 card hand is actually the board (KKTT4). So at best you are splitting with someone, and they would need to hold either 43, 42, 33, 32, or 22. Of course them having 22 is unlikely because there are only two 2s left in the deck. Even if the opponent has 52, they are beating someone who holds 22, because their best 5 card hand would be KKTT5, which beats KKTT4.

That's what makes this a bad call.

[/ QUOTE ]

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-18-2007, 10:53 PM
Jer672 Jer672 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 378
Default Re: he was a 79/71

[ QUOTE ]
This was a bad call on his part. Because there were two Kings and two Tens on the board, everyone in the hand has at least two pair (kings and tens). Therefore, having pocket 2s doesn't help you, because in Texas Hold'em you can only play the best 5 cards (combining the 5 board cards with your 2 community cards). In this case, if you hold pocket 2s in your hand, your best 5 card hand is actually the board (KKTT4). So at best you are splitting with someone, and they would need to hold either 43, 42, 33, 32, or 22. Of course them having 22 is unlikely because there are only two 2s left in the deck. Even if the opponent has 52, they are beating someone who holds 22, because their best 5 card hand would be KKTT5, which beats KKTT4.

That's what makes this a bad call.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol i think?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-18-2007, 11:16 PM
iveyleague24 iveyleague24 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 305
Default Re: he was a 79/71

called for deception
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-18-2007, 11:58 PM
JJBuffone JJBuffone is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 914
Default Re: he was a 79/71

Vanessa Rousso would approve.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-19-2007, 12:02 AM
ocdscale ocdscale is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,718
Default Re: he was a 79/71

[ QUOTE ]
This was a bad call on his part. Because there were two Kings and two Tens on the board, everyone in the hand has at least two pair (kings and tens). Therefore, having pocket 2s doesn't help you, because in Texas Hold'em you can only play the best 5 cards (combining the 5 board cards with your 2 community cards). In this case, if you hold pocket 2s in your hand, your best 5 card hand is actually the board (KKTT4). So at best you are splitting with someone, and they would need to hold either 43, 42, 33, 32, or 22. Of course them having 22 is unlikely because there are only two 2s left in the deck. Even if the opponent has 52, they are beating someone who holds 22, because their best 5 card hand would be KKTT5, which beats KKTT4.

That's what makes this a bad call.

[/ QUOTE ]

A+ level
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-19-2007, 12:20 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: he was a 79/71

I love this
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-19-2007, 12:26 AM
Abones Abones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: GOJIRA!
Posts: 1,538
Default Re: he was a 79/71

[img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-19-2007, 02:50 AM
ICMoney ICMoney is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Watching Vids > Playing
Posts: 1,720
Default Re: he was a 79/71

[] Put you on AK.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-19-2007, 04:48 AM
davebreal davebreal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: betting scare cards
Posts: 1,683
Default Re: he was a 79/71

clear setup play for future quads.

high level planning.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.