|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Staying in touch with friends | |||
| Make a concious effort to stay in touch with them |
   
|
10 | 12.05% |
| Every once in a while when the urge hits I'll give 'em a call |
  
|
35 | 42.17% |
| Almost never, I see them when I see them |
  
|
38 | 45.78% |
| Voters: 83. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
12-11-2006, 03:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Forum Political Identity Poll
I don't know if this has been done before, but the recent threads have got me wondering what the breakdown is like around here. I've got some suspicions about poster/lurker tendencies, let's see if they turn out. Apologies if none of the options fit you perfectly. If you are Fascist, you don't get a vote.
|
|
#3
12-11-2006, 03:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Forum Political Identity Poll
Sorry if the wording is off. I didn't want to include every kind of anarchist, and from my very limited knowledge, I thought "traditional anarchist" (saw this somewhere on the net) generally meant being anti-capitalism/private property, like anarcho-communists.
|
|
#4
12-11-2006, 03:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Forum Political Identity Poll
[ QUOTE ]
Sorry if the wording is off. I didn't want to include every kind of anarchist, and from my very limited knowledge, I thought "traditional anarchist" (saw this somewhere on the net) generally meant being anti-capitalism/private property, like anarcho-communists. [/ QUOTE ] Fair enough. I think that this is a fair description of some traditional anarchists, though many oppose the exploitation inherent in (state) capitalism while still believing that one can own private property.
|
|
#6
12-11-2006, 03:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Forum Political Identity Poll
What's the difference between "anarcho-capitalist" and "traditional anarchist"? fwiw, i think i'm both.
|
|
#7
12-11-2006, 03:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Forum Political Identity Poll
[ QUOTE ]
What's the difference between "anarcho-capitalist" and "traditional anarchist"? fwiw, i think i'm both. [/ QUOTE ] A traditional Anarchist does not define the entire world in terms of possessions.
|
|
#8
12-11-2006, 08:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Forum Political Identity Poll
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] What's the difference between "anarcho-capitalist" and "traditional anarchist"? fwiw, i think i'm both. [/ QUOTE ] A traditional Anarchist does not define the entire world in terms of possessions. [/ QUOTE ] Nor does an ACer.
|
|
#9
12-11-2006, 10:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Forum Political Identity Poll
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] What's the difference between "anarcho-capitalist" and "traditional anarchist"? fwiw, i think i'm both. [/ QUOTE ] A traditional Anarchist does not define the entire world in terms of possessions. [/ QUOTE ] Nor does an ACer. [/ QUOTE ] ACists only have their possession. It's a fundamental tenet of capitalism, and from that premise ACists build their world.
|
|
#10
12-11-2006, 10:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Forum Political Identity Poll
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] What's the difference between "anarcho-capitalist" and "traditional anarchist"? fwiw, i think i'm both. [/ QUOTE ] A traditional Anarchist does not define the entire world in terms of possessions. [/ QUOTE ] Nor does an ACer. [/ QUOTE ] ACists only have their possession. It's a fundamental tenet of capitalism, and from that premise ACists build their world. [/ QUOTE ] English plz. What does 'only have their posession' mean? And no, AC is constructed through negative rights, so there are no tenets. If you're talking about epistimology, then those aren't tenets either. A simple example, that you could have come up with yourself, is that an ACer does not claim that anyone owns the earth's core, or some area of water or land that's not turned into valuable use.
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
