Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-13-2006, 08:41 PM
danzasmack danzasmack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: DYNAMO HARSHBART
Posts: 7,370
Default Re: 1/2 Party 7-7 middle set hand

Bet flop. Maybe look for a turn c/r, but just jam this pot. Bet the river too.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-13-2006, 08:44 PM
milesdyson milesdyson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: trying to 363 u
Posts: 14,916
Default Re: 1/2 Party 7-7 middle set hand

rediculous
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-13-2006, 08:49 PM
danzasmack danzasmack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: DYNAMO HARSHBART
Posts: 7,370
Default Re: 1/2 Party 7-7 middle set hand

[ QUOTE ]
rediculous

[/ QUOTE ]

A buddy of mine who plays/posts on here has spelled it wrong so many times (he has a blog and a website kinda) that it's gotten to the point where I'd feel really bad telling him. Then one day there was a thread with like 6 posts spelling it wrong.

I've been meaning to change it to "playing 400nl so i can lose it at 10/20 6max" but I think he still spells it wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-13-2006, 10:48 PM
numeri numeri is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: living dangerously
Posts: 1,808
Default Re: 1/2 Party 7-7 middle set hand

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
???
Bet the flop. That check is so bad I don't know where to start.


[/ QUOTE ]
I usually would bet this but I thought as so many people were in the pot someone was bound to bet letting me check raise. I dont see how this can be a massive mistake. I wanted to try and make sure the draws had to call more than one bet to see the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]
True, it may not be as big of a mistake as I'm making out to be. I'm still not sure a check is +EV here. The times that it checks through or gets bet by the button and we blow everyone else out outweigh (at least in my mind) the times we bet and get called or bet and get to 3-bet.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-13-2006, 11:40 PM
TheHip41 TheHip41 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Every other month TAG
Posts: 5,237
Default Re: 1/2 Party 7-7 middle set hand

you hate money more than me.

just bet everytime it's your turn postflop, it's really that easy.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-14-2006, 01:22 AM
True True is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Blog ---> ssplnlpoker
Posts: 7,867
Default Re: 1/2 Party 7-7 middle set hand

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
???
Bet the flop. That check is so bad I don't know where to start.


[/ QUOTE ]
I usually would bet this but I thought as so many people were in the pot someone was bound to bet letting me check raise. I dont see how this can be a massive mistake. I wanted to try and make sure the draws had to call more than one bet to see the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]
True, it may not be as big of a mistake as I'm making out to be. I'm still not sure a check is +EV here. The times that it checks through or gets bet by the button and we blow everyone else out outweigh (at least in my mind) the times we bet and get called or bet and get to 3-bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would bet it, I am just saying the check isn't "terrible" as you put it. There are reasons to vary your play and on this board with a set I think checking isn't as bad as you fear it could be.

True
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.