Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-02-2007, 09:54 PM
Trogdor! Trogdor! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 250
Default Re: Here\'s an interesting one for you guys...

guys i think this thread is just a failed attempt at convincing people to call with T8s because nobody will call hes AA shove
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-03-2007, 05:34 AM
ama0330 ama0330 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Crushing
Posts: 5,704
Default Re: Here\'s an interesting one for you guys...

[ QUOTE ]
guys i think this thread is just a failed attempt at convincing people to call with T8s because nobody will call hes AA shove

[/ QUOTE ]

Close. Actually wait, you're way off.

I ended up folding, but I realised afterwards that he doesn't have to be shoving THAT wide a range for a call to be +EV. Given that its obvious that I misclicked, I think his range is a whole lot wider than you think. I just thought it was interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-03-2007, 05:49 AM
RoyalFarmer RoyalFarmer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 54
Default Re: Here\'s an interesting one for you guys...

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
guys i think this thread is just a failed attempt at convincing people to call with T8s because nobody will call hes AA shove

[/ QUOTE ]

Close. Actually wait, you're way off.

I ended up folding, but I realised afterwards that he doesn't have to be shoving THAT wide a range for a call to be +EV. Given that its obvious that I misclicked, I think his range is a whole lot wider than you think. I just thought it was interesting.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree with you. If he's smart enough and doesn't think you're a crazy guy who likes to raise 25 BB with big pairs, he simply has to put you on a missclick.
So his shove doesn't need a lot of backup, since he can ruin your pot-odds by pushing it in.
The only hand you might call are TT+ and AK, from his point of view. Since your range for a normal raise is much wider, Villain feels good with his move. I would do the same probably.

A call is still close and definitely not +EV.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-03-2007, 06:13 AM
Nogatsira Nogatsira is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,636
Default Re: Here\'s an interesting one for you guys...

ama I'm at school right now so I don't have any programs here to calculate.
Get poker equilator (better then pokerstove): http://www.pokerstrategy.com/softwar...ilator_1_1.zip

You can put in an equity you need and then see a range etc.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-03-2007, 06:38 AM
dirtylobster dirtylobster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,124
Default Re: Here\'s an interesting one for you guys...

If he's half decent he realizes the blinds are yet to act and thus wouldn't shove that wide of a range here.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-03-2007, 07:20 AM
Frosteater Frosteater is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 130
Default Re: Here\'s an interesting one for you guys...

[ QUOTE ]
I ended up folding, but I realised afterwards that he doesn't have to be shoving THAT wide a range for a call to be +EV. Given that its obvious that I misclicked, I think his range is a whole lot wider than you think. I just thought it was interesting.

[/ QUOTE ]

You barely know eachother, from what I understand, is the missclick really that obvious?

I just assume it is, there is one thing, I really don't understand and which would make this - without any math involved - a clear fold for me:

If he knows you missclicked, he also knows you were going to raise anyways, because if you just wanted to call, a missclick is way more likely to produce a raise to $2. So you folded every hand up to this point and now you raise in MP. Ignoring the amount for a second, if he puts you on a missclick, I think he also has to put you on an above average hand. At this point he has precisely two options: fold and wait for a better opportunity or push and put pressure on you and the rest of the table. At least I think calling isn't an option here for him, correct me if I'm wrong, but I think every half decent player should avoid a call here, it's on quarter of the stack in and probably zero FE against everyone who comes along. Now I'm taking a shot in the dark and postulate the following:

If someone is dominant/aggressive/"cool" enough to 3bet-push a range containing the likes of 22 and AJo against a missclicked but apparently decent hand, I'd personally expect him to 3bet this range in position against a standard raise as well.

If the 14/10/2 over 56 hands is any indication of his play, I just don't think he's the type of player to do this.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-03-2007, 07:28 AM
hennnerz hennnerz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UWE, Bristol
Posts: 1,208
Default Re: Here\'s an interesting one for you guys...

Why would you misclick to $25? Misclick to like 30-40 is way more realistic. I doubt anyone will ever be in this 25$ PFR scenario.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-03-2007, 07:30 AM
scallop scallop is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: YouTube: Vader Sessions.
Posts: 861
Default Re: Here\'s an interesting one for you guys...

Agreed that a call is close, and even if it's only slightly -EV I would still call, because this does SO much for my image when I stack off AIPF with T8s, (or even win the hand, which might induce tilt).

I think the advertising advantaes of this call are huge as people will open up their ranges massively vs you in the future.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-03-2007, 07:30 AM
dirtylobster dirtylobster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,124
Default Re: Here\'s an interesting one for you guys...

On FTP if you press the slidebar somewhere in the middle you could probably hit 25. And it happens once in a while when you miss the pot button and quickly press raise afterwards.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-03-2007, 10:22 AM
zooot zooot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 111
Default Re: Here\'s an interesting one for you guys...

equity
Hand 0: 37.634% { Ts8s }
Hand 1: 62.366% { 55+, A2s+, K5s+, Q7s+, J8s+, T8s+, 98s, A7o+, K9o+, Q9o+, J9o+ }


I get this range for Neutral EV: { 55+, A2s+, K5s+, Q7s+, J8s+, T8s+, 98s, A7o+, K9o+, Q9o+, J9o+ }

This is way off vs. panda's range for Neutral EV: { 22+, AJs+, KQs, AJo+, KQo }

I think the latter is a much more likely scenario obv, but am confused by my results...

edit: i guess you're just starting w/ a reasonable range and going from there, whereas i'm using the slider? anyways, interesting as he could very well be shoving the second range and nowhere near the first.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.