|
|
#1
03-08-2007, 10:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Apathy style theory question SSNL version - Checking flop in the blind
6-max. 100BB stacks. You are the BB. Someone (not the SB) raises and you call.
How much, if any, EV are you sacrificing by always 100% of the time checking the flop? 
|
|
#2
03-08-2007, 10:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Apathy style theory question SSNL version - Checking flop in the b
i check this flop pretty damn close to 100% of the time.
|
|
#3
03-08-2007, 10:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Apathy style theory question SSNL version - Checking flop in the b
i dont see how you could say always 100% of the time.. like if you spike a set, or two pair, on a draw heavy board, how do you not lead out.
|
|
#4
03-08-2007, 10:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Apathy style theory question SSNL version - Checking flop in the b
game dependant
|
|
#5
03-08-2007, 10:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Apathy style theory question SSNL version - Checking flop in the b
Dude, you didn't do this right at all.
I'd like to agree with BW, but I can't. Some factors which convince me to bet: - I have a marginal made hand or a weak draw and I think my opponents are weak - I have a strong made hand or strong draw and my image is maniac or my opponents are aggro - I have a TPTK type hand on a coordinated board
|
|
#6
03-08-2007, 10:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Apathy style theory question SSNL version - Checking flop in the b
[ QUOTE ]
i dont see how you could say always 100% of the time.. like if you spike a set, or two pair, on a draw heavy board, how do you not lead out. [/ QUOTE ] If villain cbets 100% of the time, leading out is terrible independent of your holding and the board.
|
|
#7
03-08-2007, 10:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Apathy style theory question SSNL version - Checking flop in the b
[ QUOTE ]
game dependant [/ QUOTE ] This answer is as useless and not the point of this type of thread as is possible. The idea is to discuss the kinds of things it depends on, yo.
|
|
#8
03-08-2007, 10:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Apathy style theory question SSNL version - Checking flop in the b
[ QUOTE ]
i dont see how you could say always 100% of the time.. like if you spike a set, or two pair, on a draw heavy board, how do you not lead out. [/ QUOTE ] If theres a maniac who will bluff his stack away, leading would be a big mistake.
|
|
#9
03-08-2007, 10:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Apathy style theory question SSNL version - Checking flop in the b
[ QUOTE ]
- I have a marginal made hand or a weak draw and I think my opponents are weak [/ QUOTE ] How do you know he's weak when all he's done is raising PF? If he's weak, why not c/r or stop 'n go? Ship the free money...
|
|
#10
03-08-2007, 10:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Apathy style theory question SSNL version - Checking flop in the b
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] - I have a marginal made hand or a weak draw and I think my opponents are weak [/ QUOTE ] How do you know he's weak when all he's done is raising PF? If he's weak, why not c/r or stop 'n go? Ship the free money... [/ QUOTE ] I dont mean my opponent's hand is weak, I mean he is weak. How do I know? Because I don't rely on my HUD...
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
