|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: what is better sng 6+1 or 10+1 ?
if you are better at shorter tables and are good LAG style, the 6 player is better...if you can play a really tight game, 10 player is better (i think), because you can usually double up early on if you just sit around and be patient (especially at lower limits $30 and less) - harder to double up super easy with 6 player because you are forced to play more hands.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: what is better sng 6+1 or 10+1 ?
im sorry for the misunderstanding but i ment im my orginal post the choice between 9 players sng with diffrent buy-in
$6+1 or the $10+1 i want to know where do i have the better expectation to win more. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: what is better sng 6+1 or 10+1 ?
Seems like you answered your own question.. 30% of $6 is $1.80, 22% of $10 is $2.20.
In other words, as long as your ROI in the $10 game is more than 3/5 what it is in the $6 game you'll make more per game playing in the $10 game. But, you said something about comparing FOUR $6 games to TWO $10 games. Are you saying you are more comfortable multi-tabling the lower buyin game? If you are talking about earnings per hour, you'll need to make the corresponding adjustments. (Four $6 games at 30% is worth $7.20, while two $10 games at 22% would be $4.40.) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: what is better sng 6+1 or 10+1 ?
Given you can't even spell ROI correctly, I doubt you can expect figures of 30%/22% at all.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: what is better sng 6+1 or 10+1 ?
no one has even mentioned rake... obv. 10 dollar ones are better in this respect.
|
|
|