200NL Party or Tribeca?

Conor.McCarthy · #1 01-03-2007, 09:18 AM

Could someone who has played alot of 200NL on both Party and Tribeca give me your thoughts on the differences between them? Are they similar in fishyness or is one much more profitable than the other?

Jay Riall · #2 01-03-2007, 09:33 AM

Tribeca is far, far more profitable. Party is pretty unprofitable at the moment.

skegvegaspoker · #3 01-03-2007, 10:11 AM

Plenty of good TAGs and LAGs still fill the Party tables. Tribeca is a fish pond.

Freelancer · #4 01-03-2007, 10:23 AM

Party is the worst place to be for sure. Its seriously full of TAG's and good Lags...

Yes seriously.

Sciolist · #5 01-03-2007, 10:31 AM

Tribeca: $1/$2 6 max 11 tables, 64 active players
Party: $1/$2 6 max, 30 tables, 176 active players

skegvegaspoker · #6 01-03-2007, 10:34 AM

Exactly Sciolist. So many more multi-tablers make Party have many more, much tougher tables on the go.

Tribeca FTW.

mudbuddha · #7 01-03-2007, 10:46 AM

umm party party party

rofl.. damn you all for moving to tribeca

Chomp · #8 01-03-2007, 10:52 AM

Wow. This thread is an eye-opener.

Which of the Tribeca sites is the best one to go for? And is it primarily the bonus structures differenciates them?

Freelancer · #9 01-03-2007, 10:56 AM

I'm still wondering if I am being 10the leveled here or not...

skegvegaspoker · #10 01-03-2007, 10:58 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Wow. This thread is an eye-opener.

Which of the Tribeca sites is the best one to go for? And is it primarily the bonus structures differenciates them?

[/ QUOTE ]

All of them. They're sweet.