#1
|
|||
|
|||
60: range for winning reg
the post flop aggressor is a very well known, well respected regular who plays tight/passive without a hand he wont go all the way with (early levels).
preflop raiser is unknown to me and probably unknown to other. as i look at this hand, i think his range is exactly AK,88,33. am i missing anything? Poker Stars, $55 + $5 NL Hold'em Tournament, 10/20 Blinds, 7 Players LeggoPoker Hand History Converter BTN: 1,480 Hero (SB): 3,060 BB: 1,500 UTG: 1,500 UTG+1: 1,480 MP: 1,480 CO: 1,500 Pre-Flop: (30) 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (SB) UTG folds, UTG+1 calls 20, <font color="red">MP raises to 80</font>, CO calls 80, 3 folds, UTG+1 calls 60 Flop: (270) A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (3 Players) UTG+1 checks, <font color="red">MP bets 100</font>, <font color="red">CO raises to 300</font>, UTG+1 folds, MP calls 200 Turn: (870) 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players) MP checks, <font color="red">CO bets 400</font>, MP calls 400 River: (1,670) 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players) MP checks, <font color="red">CO bets 720 and is All-In</font>, MP folds Results: 1,670 Pot CO mucked and WON 1,670 (+890 NET) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 60: range for winning reg
hand 2 (again vs an unknown)
--------------- Poker Stars, $55 + $5 NL Hold'em Tournament, 10/20 Blinds, 9 Players LeggoPoker Hand History Converter BTN: 1,500 SB: 1,500 BB: 1,500 UTG: 1,500 Hero (UTG+1): 1,500 UTG+2: 1,500 MP1: 1,500 MP2: 1,500 CO: 1,500 Pre-Flop: (30) 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (UTG+1) 5 folds, <font color="red">CO raises to 60</font>, BTN folds, SB calls 50, BB folds Flop: (140) K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) SB checks, <font color="red">CO bets 80</font>, <font color="red">SB raises to 200</font>, CO folds Results: 300 Pot SB mucked and WON 300 (+160 NET) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 60: range for winning reg
AQ is also in his range i think
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 60: range for winning reg
[ QUOTE ]
AQ is also in his range i think [/ QUOTE ] for hand 1? i think he just calls flop w/ AQ, although i could be wrong |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 60: range for winning reg
Calling that flop is too dangerous.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 60: range for winning reg
You talking bout xyz?
Throw in a discounted AQ as well to his range on hand 1, hand 2 Id think TT-QQ alot |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 60: range for winning reg
[ QUOTE ]
You talking bout xyz? Throw in a discounted AQ as well to his range on hand 1, hand 2 Id think TT-QQ alot [/ QUOTE ] no , not xyz. can i just say who? anyway, i reaaaaaaly doubt player in question c/r's hand 2 with tt-qq |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 60: range for winning reg
Just say who. No one cares.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 60: range for winning reg
its gravy.. i made a couple posts refering to a 'well known reg' .. i'm talking about gravy in all of those
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 60: range for winning reg
Check with gravy, ask if he cares if you post some hands of his you observed. Then next time, post "Interesting spacegravy hand..." and you'll get 150 replies.
|
|
|