#1
|
|||
|
|||
Venetian Deep 5-10: Top Two Reraised
Venetian 5-10
My image is tight Villain is loose-passive Effective stacks are 4500 3 limpers I limp in SB with QTo Villain limps in BB Flop (50) QT4 rainbow I bet 40 with top two Villain raises to 80 Folded around to me I reraise another 100 He reraises another 200 At this point, I have his range at: 70% two pair 29% Set 1% KK+ I call Turn (810) QT4 J I check He bets 500 I call River (1810) QT4 J J I check He checks Should I have made a big re-reraise on the flop? Should I be prepared to get it all ($4500) in there? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Venetian Deep 5-10: Top Two Reraised
Reraise more than 100 on the flop please
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Venetian Deep 5-10: Top Two Reraised
then my head asploded
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Venetian Deep 5-10: Top Two Reraised
You should have made a big reraise on the flop.
You should be prepared to fold on the flop. You should not be very results orientated because you won "so little" from T4/Q4. [ QUOTE ] 1% KK+ Villain limps in BB [/ QUOTE ] awesome please dont play 5/10 NL, I mean sure its easy peachy live (this post proves it) but still cmon just dont. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Venetian Deep 5-10: Top Two Reraised
sooooooo... he had 44, right?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Venetian Deep 5-10: Top Two Reraised
if the dude had q4 he really did win "so little" since its a chop
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Venetian Deep 5-10: Top Two Reraised
all the bet sizing in this hand really sucks.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Venetian Deep 5-10: Top Two Reraised
Lol I will never put $4500 in limped 3 way pot with 4th nuts.
Unless villain is complete moron. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Venetian Deep 5-10: Top Two Reraised
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 1% KK+ Villain limps in BB [/ QUOTE ] awesome please dont play 5/10 NL, I mean sure its easy peachy live (this post proves it) but still cmon just dont. [/ QUOTE ] He actually had AA |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Venetian Deep 5-10: Top Two Reraised
[ QUOTE ]
You should not be very results orientated because you won "so little" from T4/Q4. [/ QUOTE ] I wasn't concerned about that at all. Obviously, what I was concerned about was whether he had a set. |
|
|