#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL Party or Tribeca?
yeah i played at party for like a week, totally sux. All the fish left after they shut their doors to the US players. Now it's just a rock garden. Tribeca is definitely the way to go
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL Party or Tribeca?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Wow. This thread is an eye-opener. Which of the Tribeca sites is the best one to go for? And is it primarily the bonus structures differenciates them? [/ QUOTE ] All of them. They're sweet. [/ QUOTE ] oh [censored] me. can someone delete this thread please? ness |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL Party or Tribeca?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Wow. This thread is an eye-opener. Which of the Tribeca sites is the best one to go for? And is it primarily the bonus structures differenciates them? [/ QUOTE ] All of them. They're sweet. [/ QUOTE ] oh [censored] me. can someone delete this thread please? ness [/ QUOTE ] "Stealthy rushes off to open a Tribeca account" |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL Party or Tribeca?
Is Pokertracker/Pokerace compatible with Tribeca?
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL Party or Tribeca?
I don't know whether anyone respects the Bonuswhores game quality grid, but for .5/1 and 1/2 both Tribeca and Party are ranked surprisingly far down in terms of game softness.
Among the big sites that BW say are softer are: Paradise Mansion Titan Ladbrokes Poker Room Prima PokerChamps (?) Any thoughts on these sites re: fishiness? And any reasons NOT to be thinking about playing these sites? Edit: to add link: http://www.bonuswhores.com/site-util...ality-grid.php |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL Party or Tribeca?
[ QUOTE ]
Is Pokertracker/Pokerace compatible with Tribeca? [/ QUOTE ] Pokertracker definately and I am fairly sure PAHUD is as well. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL Party or Tribeca?
wtf y hasnt this been locked yet
|
|
|