|
View Poll Results: what is my destiny? | |||
heel | 0 | 0% | |
face | 0 | 0% | |
BASTARD! | 2 | 40.00% | |
ship it holla trollas | 3 | 60.00% | |
Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1791
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
Pr(Ac,b) = Pr(b) - Pr(a,b) = pr(b) - pr(a)pr(b) = pr(b) (1-pr(a)) = pr(b)pr(ac)
|
#1792
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
beserious is the "," intersect?
|
#1793
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
yah, pr(a,b) = pr(a AND b)
|
#1794
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
|
#1795
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
vanessa rousso's playing a $555 sng right now on stars, #65592886.
|
#1796
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] THANKS FULLTILT! Hello Samer, Upon the conclusion of a recent investigation into tournament# 30113399, we have determined there were players in the tournament engaging in collusion. In this instance, we have seized the winnings of the players involved and your tournament placing has been adjusted. You will be refunded $148.50, which will be placed in your account in the next 24-48 hours. [/ QUOTE ] Well, since they bumped you up to second, it was two players above you. This is kind of interesting since it looks like it was three regulars who all finished above you. Two of them are decent and play a lot together, seemingly more than you play against them, but it doesn't seem unreasonable for regulars. The third guy looks like a regular fish who has played a lot, but only once with each of these guys. Weird. [/ QUOTE ] dude! your right. i meant to dig up the HH, but sharkscope is much faster/easier. it HAS to be chipmover and postman who were colluding. They both have about 800 gms played with almost 200 played together. thats way too high to be coincidence. plus the third guy ahead of me is a solid losing player... well. props to FT for catching it. i obviously didnt notice at all, since neither of those names i see all that much. i did recognize chipmovers name and that he's decent. |
#1797
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
ditch, are you back in the states?
|
#1798
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
[ QUOTE ]
look what movie i just bought -Fred-Williamson/dp/B000OIZEF4/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-9442938-7465727?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1193702955&s r=8-1]http://www.amazon.com/Boss-[censored]-Fred-W...2955&sr=8-1 nsfw [/ QUOTE ] This looks soo horrible. "Part Devil...Part Legend...All Man! Blaxploitation Western parody with Williamson & Martin as a couple of bounty hunters who outhustle every white man in sight." |
#1799
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] THANKS FULLTILT! Hello Samer, Upon the conclusion of a recent investigation into tournament# 30113399, we have determined there were players in the tournament engaging in collusion. In this instance, we have seized the winnings of the players involved and your tournament placing has been adjusted. You will be refunded $148.50, which will be placed in your account in the next 24-48 hours. [/ QUOTE ] Well, since they bumped you up to second, it was two players above you. This is kind of interesting since it looks like it was three regulars who all finished above you. Two of them are decent and play a lot together, seemingly more than you play against them, but it doesn't seem unreasonable for regulars. The third guy looks like a regular fish who has played a lot, but only once with each of these guys. Weird. [/ QUOTE ] dude! your right. i meant to dig up the HH, but sharkscope is much faster/easier. it HAS to be chipmover and postman who were colluding. They both have about 800 gms played with almost 200 played together. thats way too high to be coincidence. plus the third guy ahead of me is a solid losing player... well. props to FT for catching it. i obviously didnt notice at all, since neither of those names i see all that much. i did recognize chipmovers name and that he's decent. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, well, I'm not going to make accusations since I didn't play but I am going to say that two decent players attempting to collude in that particular field is beyond retarded unless it's purely opportunistic. I would guess some sort of "check it down?" chat infraction. |
#1800
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
hmm, i doubt it considering theyve played 25% of their sngs together...ill check the HH for the chat in a bit
|
|
|