#1
|
|||
|
|||
Value bet on semi-dangerous board: too thin?
Villain is unknown, has been 33/11 over the past 27 hands. He tanked before checking the river. I like thin value bets, but is this too thin? What about my bet size?
Full Tilt Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $3/$6 Blinds - 5 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter) SB: $700.00 BB: $415.90 Hero (UTG): $663.00 CO: $651.90 BTN: $916.70 Preflop: Hero is dealt 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (5 Players) <font color="red">Hero raises to $21.00</font>, 2 folds, SB calls $18.00, BB calls $15.00 Flop: ($63) 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (3 Players) SB checks, BB checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $45.00</font>, SB folds, BB calls $45.00 Turn: ($153) 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players) BB checks, Hero checks River: ($153) 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players) BB checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $75.00</font> |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Value bet on semi-dangerous board: too thin?
i think i take a free showdown
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Value bet on semi-dangerous board: too thin?
Vs this plyer i dont think its too thin
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Value bet on semi-dangerous board: too thin?
Not really thin.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Value bet on semi-dangerous board: too thin?
FWIW, villain's name was sculpin1961. Were you there, Teh1337zor?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Value bet on semi-dangerous board: too thin?
[ QUOTE ]
Not really thin. [/ QUOTE ] yeh, not thin at all. when i first glanced at this hand i assumed you fired the turn as well, but since you didn't, this is totally standard. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Value bet on semi-dangerous board: too thin?
no just judging off of stats
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Value bet on semi-dangerous board: too thin?
river is more thin than a turn bet would be, since he can still have outs there.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Value bet on semi-dangerous board: too thin?
i like
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Value bet on semi-dangerous board: too thin?
why didnt u bet turn? I think 75 is too low, bet at least 115
|
|
|