|
View Poll Results: Hands Per Day | |||
Less than 500 | 34 | 35.05% | |
500-1000 | 28 | 28.87% | |
1000-2000 | 26 | 26.80% | |
2000-3000 | 5 | 5.15% | |
4000+ | 4 | 4.12% | |
Voters: 97. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#511
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hacker Attack (All Info Game Thread - Feb 19 Start)
Wolves are going to want to kill those who came up wolf, just in case it was one of them
|
#512
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hacker Attack (All Info Game Thread - Feb 19 Start)
I was thinking of a phased peek plan. I am sure this will be shot down, but I will float it anyway.
Day three we have four people post their peeks. We use those to get some idea of who is good and evil and try to make a good lynch. The wolves almost have to kill the most accurate of those people. The next day another group goes. It would eliminate some of the chaos of everyone posting their peeks at once and give us a smaller subset of information to focus on. I am starting by voting Econo. My peek came back as village. |
#513
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hacker Attack (All Info Game Thread - Feb 19 Start)
Yes nich, but a wolf getting peeked at wolf is alot worse than a villager getting peeked as villager.
This is why wolves would want to kill the ppl who peek a wolf |
#514
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hacker Attack (All Info Game Thread - Feb 19 Start)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If people post that they peeked a wolf, doesn't that make them more likely to be nightkilled? [/ QUOTE ] ?@this there are paranoid seers that always see wolves paranoid useless ones that will mostly see wolves insane seers that will mostly see wolves the wolves aren't gonna eat us based on if we peeked 'wolf' or 'villager' last night and i'm not asking for whom everyone peeked...just that we get a tally of everyone and if they peeked wolf or villager that's all [/ QUOTE ] and with 7 wolves, why do you think a tally would help? |
#515
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hacker Attack (All Info Game Thread - Feb 19 Start)
[ QUOTE ]
actually, easier way would be for everyone to post their peek result (but not target) [/ QUOTE ] This can still give info to the wolves. Do you see why? |
#516
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hacker Attack (All Info Game Thread - Feb 19 Start)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm not sure I like everyone posting their peek, not even if it's just village/wolf. [/ QUOTE ] I am sure I don't like it. BAD IDEA [/ QUOTE ] why? info is GOOD for village everyone posting if they saw villager/wolf gives the bad guys no more info than it gives the village |
#517
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hacker Attack (All Info Game Thread - Feb 19 Start)
[ QUOTE ]
Day three we have four people post their peeks. We use those to get some idea of who is good and evil and try to make a good lynch. The wolves almost have to kill the most accurate of those people. The next day another group goes. [/ QUOTE ] Books idea has merit. We should definitely NOT be forcing people to post their peeks though. 3 or 4 people who think they have some good info (or who think they have bad info), but definitely who have something they think could be useful should be volunteering it. |
#518
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hacker Attack (All Info Game Thread - Feb 19 Start)
at this point, info helps the wolves alot more than the village
|
#519
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hacker Attack (All Info Game Thread - Feb 19 Start)
Right now we have zero information. We need to somehow get some information from most of these useless peeks in order to have any chance to win this game. If we let out too much info, it will help the wolves.
There is a fine balance between giving up too much and not giving up enough. I like Nich's plan, and Books' plan as being in the correct area. |
#520
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hacker Attack (All Info Game Thread - Feb 19 Start)
Anyway, can we please get a wagon on a wolf today?
Does anyone think chuckles is a bad choice? |
|
|