Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: No threadjacking rule
Yes 8 53.33%
No 7 46.67%
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121  
Old 08-15-2007, 11:09 PM
0evg0 0evg0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: mano a mano
Posts: 9,235
Default Re: Stars Regs Thread

I'm still waiting on reasoning as to why I'm not included on this supposed 99% reliable datamine.
  #122  
Old 08-15-2007, 11:12 PM
hotbacon hotbacon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 757
Default Re: Stars Regs Thread

some players that i found to be tough without looking at pt or anything:
landerd
lucky_wins
ofishstx, but i think thats cuz i played like [censored] vs him
chillywilly
jager224
boosheit

i think weak tite and suntzureps are over rated, especially suntzureps.

as far as quixoticist or w/e goes, i think i moved up before i got to play him at 6max 1/2 nl, but i played him headsup a lot and he didn't seem good at all, but maybe that's cuz i ran pretty sick hot against him.
  #123  
Old 08-15-2007, 11:16 PM
carrotsnake carrotsnake is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,278
Default Re: Stars Regs Thread

its a super secret keep 0evg0 out club
  #124  
Old 08-15-2007, 11:36 PM
johndenver johndenver is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 263
Default Re: Stars Regs Thread

[ QUOTE ]
since mid-May at 0.50/1 i think these guys r pretty solid:
(in no order)

Klaskin
bmxreed36
Nataraja21
ffguitarguy
agstremist
ianbarns
nice2beatu
gamblerNCH
sm0kelm
obsid1an
vic3roy
txnoob

[/ QUOTE ]

yay gogogo ego boost [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
  #125  
Old 08-15-2007, 11:43 PM
Fat Nicky Fat Nicky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: StartWeight-260, Current-238
Posts: 5,017
Default Re: Stars Regs Thread

[ QUOTE ]
I'm still waiting on reasoning as to why I'm not included on this supposed 99% reliable datamine.

[/ QUOTE ]

dude, i told you before...100% of hands are not mined. i'd be surprised if even 70% were mined.

if you must know, since 6/1, just less than 20K hands have been tracked for you at 200nl on stars (the filter which I used was for players w/at least 20K hands, so you were not even considered). i'm sure you've played much more than that.

hope this makes you feel better [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
  #126  
Old 08-15-2007, 11:56 PM
blah-blah-blah blah-blah-blah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 667
Default Re: Stars Regs Thread

i thought you couldn't datamine on stars
  #127  
Old 08-15-2007, 11:58 PM
Fat Nicky Fat Nicky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: StartWeight-260, Current-238
Posts: 5,017
Default Re: Stars Regs Thread

[ QUOTE ]
i thought you couldn't datamine on stars

[/ QUOTE ]

you can't. fwiw, i have never mined a single hand on poker stars
  #128  
Old 08-16-2007, 12:01 AM
blah-blah-blah blah-blah-blah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 667
Default Re: Stars Regs Thread

oh. i thought u were mining these hands urself. where r u getting this data from?
  #129  
Old 08-16-2007, 12:19 AM
futuredoc85 futuredoc85 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 9,014
Default Re: Stars Regs Thread

[ QUOTE ]
some players that i found to be tough without looking at pt or anything:
landerd
lucky_wins
ofishstx, but i think thats cuz i played like [censored] vs him
chillywilly
jager224
boosheit

i think weak tite and suntzureps are over rated, especially suntzureps.

as far as quixoticist or w/e goes, i think i moved up before i got to play him at 6max 1/2 nl, but i played him headsup a lot and he didn't seem good at all, but maybe that's cuz i ran pretty sick hot against him.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah i actually played like 2500 hands against him at 2/4, mostly HU but b4 HU tables, one night and raped him severely and thought he was terrible. the more i play with him though the more i think he may actually be really good, or at the very least hard to play against.
  #130  
Old 08-16-2007, 12:23 AM
Weir Weir is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,366
Default Re: Stars Regs Thread

do i need more hands to be labled the worst?
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.